Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

nl200 2p UTG vs SB

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
19 Views
ciachooooo
Joined: 02.01.2010

CO was fish, so no doubt I should open ATs here.

SB is reg, 25/19 with 8.5% total 3b.
sb vs utg he 3b 4%

total sb calling range 9%, vs CO 5%, vs bu 9% (so this looks odd to me)

passive postflop (afq by street 31/26/19)
wtsd 27, wwsf 42, w$sd 54

x/r 1/6/2
fold vs cb oop 62/35/50(8)

1) do you do different sizing?
2) b/f river? or just xbeh? he doesn't look like bluffcatching type of player, and he can still have AA/KK/TT/AK, but on the other hand all draws missed, so maybe he calls his Ax hands? so easy/hard bet/xbeh/whatever? sizing?

$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ciachooooo ($230.59) 115bb
UTG+1 Player1 ($314.46) 157bb
CO Player2 ($379.31) 190bb
BTN Player3 ($124.95) 62bb
SB Player4 ($200) 100bb
BB Player5 ($235.03) 118bb

Pre-Flop: ($3, 6 players) ciachooooo is UTG A♥ 10:heart:
ciachooooo raises to $6, 3 folds, Player4 calls $5, 1 fold

Flop: K♠ 10:spade: A♦ ($14, 2 players)
Player4 checks, ciachooooo bets $9.98, Player4 calls $9.98

Turn: 6♦ ($33.96, 2 players)
Player4 checks, ciachooooo bets $24.20, Player4 calls $24.20

River: 3♥ ($82.36, 2 players)
Player4 checks, ciachooooo ($190.41)?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Coach
w34z3l
Joined: 03.08.2009

Hey Ciachooooo,

Flop cbet is fine, sizing is fine.

Turn is fine, sizing is fine.

If you don't expect villain to bluff-catch yet may call with some worse Ax hands it makes sense just to put out a small bet out there for value, perhaps half pot or less.


Reply
Quote