Villain is 27/23 - 274hands. Overall seems as a very aggro reg.
3b 16.8%
3b BUvsCO 43%(7)
f24b 0/3
Notes:
-3barr 44 on TQK 7 2
-flats wide EP/MP vs 3b -> barr vs missed on high card paired board 60% (T+R)
-BUvsCO AQs stackoff
Stacks:
UTG ($100) 100bb
UTG+1 ($97) 97bb
CO ($123.34) 123bb
BTN ($138.01) 138bb
SB ($104.53) 105bb
Hero (BB) ($141.41) 141bb
Pre-Flop: ($1.50, 6 players) Hero is BB Q♦ Q♥
2 folds, CO raises to $2.50, BTN raises to $8, 1 fold, Hero raises to $22, CO folds, BTN calls $14
Flop: 2♠ K♥ 8♠ ($47, 2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $15, Hero calls $15
Turn: 7♠ ($77, 2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $25, Hero calls $25
River: 5♦ ($127, 2 players)
Hero checks, BTN goes all-in $76.01, Hero calls $76.01
PF; I am being wrong by making a conclusion that a villain on a agro side would rather stackoff more AK combos than flatting them, even when deep? If I am smart guessing should his range here be smth like AK(few combos), AQ, ATs-AQs, KQs, QJs, JJ,?
Sizing wise I make it bit over 2,5x? Is that okay 140bb deep? Should I just keep it standard 2,5x?
F; no real value to be gain by betting(only a few fd combos, and I don't want to turn my QQ into 3barr bluff since only like 2combos of KQ might fold by the river. And I am not folding to one bet.
T; I have no idea what to think of his small bet but the price is awesome.
R; We're getting 2.7:1 on the call. Given his overall image, the board runnout and the assumption he would still stack some AK pre even deeper I eer on the side of calling.
Overall it is kinda hard with looser and more aggressive guys since I am not sure what his range for calling pre there is. Sometimes it can be rly random.
What do you think?
