Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

KTo

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
622 Views
MarinaOrel
Joined: 12.09.2011

Hi!
Its 90 men 1.5, 2 tables left

Poker Stars No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t150/t300 Blinds ante 25 - 8 players - View hand 2464391
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

SB: t11466
BB: t4994
UTG: t4155
UTG+1: t5490
Hero (MP1): t23974
MP2: t4767
CO: t3781
BTN: t16468

Pre Flop: Hero is MP1 with T :heart: K :club:
2 folds, Hero raises to t645, 2 folds, BTN calls t645, 2 folds

Flop: (t1940) Q :heart: 3 :heart: 7 :spade: (2 players)
Hero bets t1200, BTN calls t1200

Turn: (t4340) A :spade: (2 players)
Hero bets t2700, BTN calls t2700

River: (t9740) J :heart: (2 players)
Hero bets t3870, BTN raises to t9740, Hero ?

Our opp : call open frm bu 6%, 3 bet bu 4%
agression 0.8 flop/0.8 turn/1.3 river , fold vs flop cb 83%
785 hands
So his preflop range is something like 55-TT, ATs-AQs, AJo-AQo, KTs+, QTs+
So standart cbet on a flop. When i bet on a turn, i hope he folds hands like 88-TT and maybe weak Qx.
On a river i bet small, hope he call with Qx or 2 pairs.
So main question - can i call his raise on a river?
Hands i can beat here- is 77, AQ, QJ.
But! 77 he should raise on a flop or turn, cause turn contains too many drow.
AQ same. So its only QJ he can have here, and raise my bet on a river.
But the problem is - our opp very passive. He has only 0.8 agression on a flop and turn!
But at the same time, he raise me with all flashes here. So can i call reraise on a river? And what an optimal play here?
Ty


Reply
Quote
2 replies
Tiltberger
Joined: 23.06.2005

Hey Marina!

I would cbet slightly smaller... 950 should to the trick!
as played I like the 2nd barrel and small valuebet. You can fold pretty much against all players...

sets would be no valuejam for me... but there are playres who overplay their sets... But imo you run into flash very often but -> you still get value from 2pairs who would call!

so b/f is fine!

Greets,
Tiltberger


Reply
Quote
MarinaOrel
Joined: 12.09.2011

Hi, Tiltberger!
Ty for evaluation!


Reply
Quote