TJs vs 3bet

Shit was typing some calcs, got erased. You can probably use 1-@% calldown freauencies here

I think he probably has a 9-10% range here.

Pf: im defending 22+, suited broadways, T8s and T9s,
Turn: im defending 88+, thats around top 65% of your turn range
River: defend top 57% = 0.57*38=22

Sets: 12
2p: 5
Kqs: 3
ATs: 3
Defending lighter than that may be too loose unless he is barreling way more often than usual. If u want to widen ur calldown range slightly u can include QTs and maybe JTs

Originally posted by mbml
Shit was typing some calcs, got erased.

You are bluffing, right?

Originally posted by mbml
River: defend top 57% = 0.57*38=22

Sets: 12
2p: 5
Kqs: 3
ATs: 3

Thats the calculation if you assume that I call down sets.
I actually always raise sets (unless it is a top set J+), because I want to
raise bdfd on flop to defend easier gto (unless villian is super agro postflop).

I also have calling range JJ, QQ, and few AA, KK so I raise KK+.

So this all changes on river that I have 12 combos less (sets) so that I have to call QTs, JTs.
Why didnt you calculate KJs? If I raise 12 combos sets on flop, I would min raise around 18-20 bdfd, so it would be KQs, KJs, QJs, 89s, and I would call AJs, AQ, AK (I raise Kx, Qx because I dont have showdown value).
So basically I have even less Kx on turn and river.

Would it be better to call all strong hands on flop and turn to be able to call down better hands on turn and river especially IP? Imo if I call flop all strong, then I need to flat too many bdfd hands, which means I can hardly defend enough % on turn unless I call A high (off course depends on turn card) ?

texture is dry, and this is 3b pot where you are IP. I don't think you should really have a raising range here.

I think protecting weaker hands in your range takes priority over raising to give yourself more bluff raising combos.

I was typing on my phone OTW home from the airport, and I switched apps so the page refreshed. I remembered the combo numbers so I just inserted them.