Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL100 K7s deep

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
16 Views
duder1n0
Joined: 07.07.2009

Poker Stars, $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 2 Players

BB: $239.13 (239.1 bb)
Hero (SB): $360.56 (360.6 bb)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 7 K
Hero raises to $3, BB calls $2

Flop: ($6) Q 9 5 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($6) 3 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $3.95, BB calls $3.95

River: ($13.90) J (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $11, BB raises to $30.47, Hero ??? (Villain has 201.71$ left after x/raising)

post put in wrong category, it was a HU Zoom hand

BB after 566 hands
call steal in BB 44
to flop cbet fold/call/xraise 37/47/16
AFq F/T/R 34/26/24
wtsd/w$sd/wwsf 30/47/47

Weaker reg, generally he was somewhat of a station, and not too aggressive, or creative with blufflines overall.

I didnt cbet despite backdoors, cause he doesnt like folding.

On the river I dont think he could have a high bluffing frequency (if any), but this deep I was unsure even with the second nuts. He can have lots of weaker made hands, and being somewhat of a station, he can even herocall with weaker. So reraise/fold? What size? Or just overbet push and hope he herocalls?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
mbml
Joined: 27.11.2008

I would expect him to C/R the turn with sets, straights probably lead the Turn or c/r the Turn.

I don't think he has too many 2pairs, and I'm not even certain whether he would raise them or not.

QJ probably leads the Turn, J9 is the only hand that makes sense. J5s too perhaps? But he shouldn't have J5o IMO vs your 3BB open.

And checkraising J5 is probably way too thin.

This means that he's usually repping a flush here. Or perhaps a bottom pair with a flush blocker (like A:h5:c)

I think people often lead pair+FD on the Turn given that they would have so much equity.

http://www.pokerstrategy.com
Board: Qh9s5s3hJh
Equity Win Tie
MP2 68.75% 68.75% 0.00% { Kh7h }
MP3 31.25% 31.25% 0.00% { J9s, AhTh, Ah8h, Th8h, Ah6h, 8h6h, Ah4h, Ah2h, J9o }

You don't have enough equity to reraise here.


Reply
Quote