Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL4 6max AA on BB vs CO

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
814 Views

partypoker - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (BB): 110.5 BB
UTG: 110.25 BB (VPIP: 23.74, PFR: 19.07, 3Bet Preflop: 6.38, Hands: 266)
MP: 143.5 BB (VPIP: 38.24, PFR: 17.65, 3Bet Preflop: 8.43, Hands: 215)
CO: 118.5 BB (VPIP: 21.88, PFR: 13.44, 3Bet Preflop: 3.06, Hands: 326)
BTN: 152.75 BB (VPIP: 20.95, PFR: 14.98, 3Bet Preflop: 7.63, Hands: 1,095)
SB: 7.75 BB (VPIP: 43.48, PFR: 21.74, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 46)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has A♠ A♣

fold, fold, CO raises to 3 BB, fold, fold, Hero raises to 10 BB, CO calls 7 BB

Flop: (20.5 BB, 2 players) 2♥ T♦ 4♣
Hero bets 14.5 BB, CO calls 14.5 BB

Turn: (49.5 BB, 2 players) T♣
Hero bets 35.25 BB, CO calls 35.25 BB

River: (120 BB, 2 players) 4♠
Hero checks, CO bets 57 BB, Hero = ???
Is option here to fold or is fine just call/go allin?

Spoiler

calls 50.75 BB and is all-in

CO shows 2♣ 2♦ (Full House, Twos full of Tens)
(Pre 18%, Flop 89%, Turn 91%)
Hero mucks A♠ A♣ (Two Pair, Aces and Tens)
(Pre 82%, Flop 11%, Turn 9%)
CO wins 6.25 BB
CO wins 210.5 BB


Reply
Quote
4 replies
imfar
Joined: 20.07.2009

Why do you check on the river?


Reply
Quote

Of course I was an aggressor so I must bet and go all-in anyway. I think nothing to do here...
Thx buddy for a good question. :f_drink:


Reply
Quote
imfar
Joined: 20.07.2009

I am not saing that this is good or bad, but definitely it is good to ask yourself why I do this, why I do that. It's also worth to write this here, so other people could understand how are you thinking.

Try to leave here some information about his aggression postflop. But I yhink that we can read something from his preflop play and assume that he is a rather passive player.

Regular players can flat your re-steal with hands like medium pocket pairs and broadways.
I'd say JJ-99,AQs-ATs,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,AQo-AJo,KQo and maybe AK, QQ. If they are calling here with small pocket pairs they will be loosing money in long run so it is good for you =).

It will be hard for you to get 3 streets of value from any part of his range. other than JJ QQ He will be folding a lot on the turn. I think it might be a good idea to just x/c the turn and if he checks, than bet on the next street. If he bets the turn card and on the river again then folding is ok, I think. But these are just my thoughts, hope someone elese will write something usefull :)


Reply
Quote
metza
Joined: 28.01.2012

Originally posted by imfar
It will be hard for you to get 3 streets of value from any part of his range. other than JJ QQ He will be folding a lot on the turn. I think it might be a good idea to just x/c the turn and if he checks, than bet on the next street. If he bets the turn card and on the river again then folding is ok, I think. But these are just my thoughts, hope someone elese will write something usefull :)

Yeah was just about to say the same thing but already been said. Turn is better as x/c. With 316 hands we should have enough stats on villains postflop behaviour to decide if river is x/f or x/c

Also there is a sizing problem here. Getting to the river with 57bb behind and a 120bb pot is not ideal. When you have a monster it is, but the problem these sizings cause is exactly what happens here: when we bet so big on flop and turn, it allows villain to fold weaker hands in his range more easily, meaning we get to the river against a stronger range but with less than half pot behind. It's really awkward.

This flop is really dry. In wet flop 3bet pots we can bet big flop and jam turn but here we wanna play 3 streets. We can bet a little bit smaller on flop and turn and aim to set up a 2/3 pot jam on the river (if we want to bet bet bet. Here I don't think we should)


Reply
Quote