Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
$0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
Known players:
[tg]BU$5.53:///////;SB$4.70:///////;BB$4.53:///////;MP2 (Hero)$6.94:///////;MP3$0.57:///////;CO$2.41:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is MP2 with Q:d, A:d.
Hero raises to $0.06, MP3 folds, CO raises to $0.10, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.04.
Flop: ($0.23) J:c, A:h, 7:d (2 players)
Hero checks, CO checks.
Turn: ($0.23) <9♥:> (2 players)
Hero bets $0.16, CO calls $0.16.
River: ($0.55) <8♥:> (2 players)
Spoiler
Hero bets $0.20, CO calls $0.20.
Final Pot: $0.95.
Results follow:
Hero shows a pair of aces(Q:d A:d).
CO shows two pairs, nines and eights(8:d 9:d).
CO wins with two pairs, nines and eights(8:d 9:d).
CO I considered a fishy player. I bet 0.20 on the river because I did not want to x and call a bigger bet. Also x/f seemed too weak to me at the time. I figured I might get called by worse, but that seems questionable to me now as only A2 through A6 could possibly call, and even if they were in villains min-3b range, and he would x behind flop, why should they call this river - even a fish might fold them on this board. So x/f must be right on this runout. Do you agree?
