NL10 QJs

of course fold without info he had 43, 33

btn had 33? that's the only logical hand! I know:).

The x on flop does not correspond with the raise on turn. Sets and overpairs will not miss the cbet on flop.
It looks like an AK/AQ that do not cbet flop but attack us when we bet...
Can you give some postflop stats?

I doubt you get anything usefull out of those postflop stats.

Iwant to see if there is active tendency. Is he active or passive.

What stat do you like?

he is a nitty and he raise big, I fold: I think that he plays faceup, he doesn't bluff enough here

Originally posted by advancedTN1984
I doubt you get anything usefull out of those postflop stats.

AF, Flop Agg, Turn Agg...

Even if he would be bluffing often, can we still call? He might have A high or draws etc.. Imo this was well played.

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by advancedTN1984
I doubt you get anything usefull out of those postflop stats.

AF, Flop Agg, Turn Agg...

would fold here as well but keep an eye on him because we have info on villain.

This is a stupid spot. Even if we would know villain is aggressive and will be bluffing a lot, what can we do when we are oop? Bluff 3bet him OTT or call and donk shove river? This is well played and I don't think we have any better lines here.

Nitrol asked for those stats, so I gave him.

And I dont agree that this is a stupid spot. We played it fine, but could consider 3bet bluffing turn with our gutshot. But I prefer to have more equity in such a spot.

I see that he is not cbetting much on flop. This means we can attack turn.
His move is awkward tho.

It doesn't matter what he has. If he has nuts, he beats us. If he is bluffing he is beating us too. This is an easy hand. I'd love to discuss rebluffing in general, but this spot has almost everything talking against it, beginning with the facts that it is NL10, he bluff-RAISED and we are out of position.