Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

K7s, 2nd flush

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
135 Views
gandy666
Joined: 11.01.2017

iPoker - £0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BB: 137.5 BB (VPIP: 18.14, PFR: 11.95, 3Bet Preflop: 6.25, Hands: 231)
UTG: 98.5 BB (VPIP: 21.95, PFR: 7.32, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 41)
MP: 214.5 BB (VPIP: 30.36, PFR: 18.75, 3Bet Preflop: 3.85, Hands: 113)
CO: 98 BB (VPIP: 20.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 6)
BTN: 80.5 BB (VPIP: 53.57, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 29)
Hero (SB): 101 BB

Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has K♦ 7♦

fold, fold, fold, BTN calls 1 BB, Hero calls 0.5 BB, BB checks

Flop: (3 BB, 3 players) T♦ J♥ 6♦
Hero bets 2 BB, fold, BTN calls 2 BB

Turn: (7 BB, 2 players) 2♠
Hero bets 2 BB, BTN calls 2 BB

River: (11 BB, 2 players) 4♦
Hero bets 5 BB, BTN raises to 15 BB, Hero raises to 25 BB, BTN raises to 75.5 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 50.5 BB

This guy looks fishy and was passive so far
Lead bet to steal pot on flop
Block bet on turn and maybe kicking some Ax.
Dunno river, I hope he had played that way some sets or weaker flushes

How bad was it?


Reply
Quote
3 replies
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Never play for all your money in a limped pot without the nuts!!!


Reply
Quote
rvnikauj
Joined: 03.02.2017

My two cents here...
Well, I see the stats and BB is a regular he might drop the hand. Button is fish calling station. I'd raised the hand if I'd wanted to play it. Completing the small blind without flush blocker (Ax) seems weak. Maybe a small pair as 22-33 has a lot of potential to get a set for very cheap in this case and most of the time you'll have the nuts, even punish AA, KK, Ax limpers.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

For me it doesn't even matter if the pot is limped or not, I would still try to avoid stacking off without the nuts.
Here I would probably just check the turn and when you hit the river I would just call his raise.


Reply
Quote