Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

QJo IP vs small 3bet

6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
411 Views
Hesticus
Joined: 24.06.2008

Pacific $5.00 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players

SB: $5.68 - VPIP: 38, PFR: 26, 3B: 14, AF: 1.4, Hands: 90
BB: $5.07
UTG: $5.12 - VPIP: 14, PFR: 6, 3B: 0, AF: 1.5, Hands: 85
MP: $5.33
CO: $5.37
Hero (BTN): $10.76

Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero is BTN with Q :diamond: J :club:
3 folds, Hero raises to $0.11, SB raises to $0.31, BB calls $0.26, Hero ??

Can we call this small 3bet?


Reply
Quote
5 replies
bssjonny94
Joined: 04.02.2012

Whilst i think we can call his 3bets a bit wider here because we are IP and villain has a high 3bet stat, i think 4 bet/fold is a better line to take. However, i think just folding is even better than that since we are rarely getting him to fold much of his 3bet range since he has such a high VP.
If we call we are mostly just hoping to hit a straight or 2 pair most of the time. Otherwise we are dominated by AK, AQ, KQ, AJ, KJ, QQ+.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

I don't know what is the best move here. But I can agree with bssjonny94.
We basically maybe could call because IP and MW, but our hand is quite crap. 4betting as a bluff looks reasonable but dunno if just folding would be better


Reply
Quote
Hesticus
Joined: 24.06.2008

What about our implied odds here? How good are they vs this 3bet?


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

4b is a bit too expensive and we don't block A or K.
Calling is not that good as we will be dominated . AQ AJ KQ are 3b is and do dominate us.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Yea, implied odds would mean that you actually win something when you hit. QJo doesn't hit so strong very often. Our top pairs would be dominated. If this was suited I might call.


Reply
Quote