Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

AKo Villain possibly rivered trips,

5 Posts
5 Users
1 Reactions
1,511 Views
DedoMassivo
Joined: 01.03.2017

Hey!
So this is a hand in which the only doubts I have is how to assess how many bluff does he have on the River, I will show my thought process and see if my "range narrowing" is well done and if you would do it differently. I will not post the outcome of the hand (not even spoiler) as I think that in this specific case it can have a lot of influence in your feedback.

Poker Stars, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 4 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $2.09 (104.5 bb)
BB: $5.59 (279.5 bb)
Hero (CO): $1.92 (96 bb)
BTN: $1.95 (97.5 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with A♣: K♥:
Hero raises to $0.06, BTN raises to $0.21, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.15
I think preflop is rather standard as I don't feel confortable getting it in against this player who is very tight 3Betting (3% over 90 hands)
Flop: ($0.45) 5♣: 2♥: K♠: (2 players)
I flop pretty well, I check as I think that Vill will Cbet here a nice chunk of time (I now check his stats and see that this player Cbets very little which makes me assume that he does not have many bluff when he Cbets)
Hero checks, BTN checks

Turn: ($0.45) 4♠: (2 players)
Hero bets $0.30, BTN calls $0.30
Turn is a Blank and I now feel very confortable to bet for value as I think that he bet's flop with AA and KK, although he only has 3 and 1 combos of each respectively (I block with my hand and the board) which makes it very unlikely. He calls and at this moment I put him in a range of JJ+ (maybe QQ+) and AK.
River: ($1.05) Q♣: (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.72, Hero ??
So, the QQ gets there and I am facing a decision. When I check, showing weakness, I am really susceptible to a bluff bet, the question is how many times does he bet as a bluff and how many does he bet for value? Since his range is, let's assume, JJ+ and AK, I beat 6 Combos(JJ), Chop with 6 Combos(AK) and lose with 7combos (AA, KK, QQ). Another question is, does he really turn his JJ into bluffs? I feel rather tempted assuming that this reggish microstakes villain is not capable of doing that (and he shouldn't, at least in these limits, I think).
So that he has no bluffs and only value bets, which I Chop with 6 of them and lose with 7 of them. Clearly this is a -EV call from my reasoning but I would like to get some feedback on that.

Cheers!
DedoMassivo


Reply
Quote
4 replies
Pokamon
Joined: 15.04.2006

hey dedo,

very nice on point analysis. the flaw is your presumption. over a 90 hand sample the 3bet does not converge.

a good player should have a ~8-12% 3bet in that spot.

you can not make such drastic changes w/o sufficient data. you could argue, that he might be on the lower end of that spectrum, but you still dont know.

i would go w the average, redo the analysis and call the river.

btw versus a 3% 3-bet you should consider folding AK.


Reply
Quote
Spidey1978
Joined: 25.07.2007

I think you possibly could be 4-betting for value here pre-flop - difficult to say with small stats, but like Pokamon says his 3betting range could be a lot wider than you assume.

Anybody else got any ideas on Villians range?


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

You are changing your standard play way too much based on way too small sample. Your hand is underrepresented.
I would bet the river, if you believe villain is very strong here you can bet small and fold vs a raise. As played I would definitely call.


Reply
Quote
msnek
Joined: 01.10.2008

Sample is low. I am getting it in preflop. Postflop as played bet-fold river for 2/3.


Reply
Quote