77, Call on river with weak flush

If we think about a standard reg opening from UTG, he might fold A5s-A9s. He also should not have QJo in his opening range. 33,44 are probably folded pre too. Same goes with 56s and K9s. JT should be only suited hands.
Sooo from that list you think he cbets the flop with, I would say only a small part are realistic (if villain is a decent player).

OTT I would fold.

I don't think that the JT continues betting on turn. Against that range the pot odds are still in my favor so I believe the call is profitable.

Did you consider that villain could have tons of better flushes and flush draws? Even if you hit your flush, you might be losing your whole stack to a higher flush. Those are called reverse implied odds.

After UTG 3barrels here, I'm almost sure that he has a better flush.

Given the stupidity of the showdown, I would certainly not be surprised to see villain opening quite wide UTG. Well maybe not A5o though but then again who knows.
Also I'd totally be opening 44-, 56s and K9s at most NL5 tables. Am I not reg enough ? Am I the most lagish of regs ?

Anyway spewy hand once again, fold at least on the turn.

Originally posted by MyFloXyBabY
Also I'd totally be opening 44-, 56s and K9s at most NL5 tables. Am I not reg enough ? Am I the most lagish of regs ?

Noo you are not a regular.. Just a fish who plays a bit more often than other fishes
Just kidding. I can agree with opening 44 and 56s. That is a bit more loose than what I would do as standard but it doesn't mean it would be bad.. But K9s?

I know I'm a big fish but I've heard that K9s is in Snowie's ranges. I know people playing zoom midstakes that are adamant about it (and even Q9s) being more playable than 44-
What is funny about 56s is that some ranges put it on the open for board covering reasons whereas they don't advice to play 67s and 78s that they consider too dominated.