Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

full house vs full house

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
122 Views

I put him on flush, thats why i checked the river with nuts also because he has high river c-bet %. Straight flush would have just been too unlikely. Would you have done the same or would you have just bet the river?
What would you have done on the turn, call the bet or bet yourself?
Was the calling the CO bet with AQo in BB preflop the correct play?

Villain stats: (484)/38/26/4.4
cbet flop 73%, cbet turn 38%, cbet river 67%

PokerStars - $0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players

MP: $16.81 (168.1 bb)
CO: $17.95 (179.5 bb)
BTN: $12.22 (122.2 bb)
SB: $10.52 (105.2 bb)
Hero (BB): $27.91 (279.1 bb)
UTG: $10.50 (105 bb)

SB posts $0.05, Hero posts BB $0.10

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.15) Hero has Q♠: A♥:
2 folds, CO raises to $0.35, BTN calls $0.35, fold, Hero calls $0.25

Flop: ($1.10, 3 players) A♣: 9♥: Q♥:
Hero bets $1.05, CO calls $1.05, fold

Turn: ($3.20, 2 players) J♥:
Hero checks, CO bets $1.60, Hero calls $1.60

River: ($6.40, 2 players) A♦:
Hero checks, CO bets $3.40, Hero raises to $24.91 and is all-in, CO calls $11.55 and is all-in

Results: $36.30 pot ($1.50 rake)
Final Board: A♣: 9♥: Q♥: J♥: A♦:

Hero shows Q♠: A♥:: (Full House, Aces full of Queens)
(Pre 43%, Flop 90%, Turn 30%)

CO shows J♠: J♦:: (Full House, Jacks full of Aces)
(Pre 57%, Flop 10%, Turn 70%)

Hero wins $34.80


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

I have moved your hand to our hand discussion forum. There fits it better.

Pre-flop you could think of a squeeze play to like $1,50. Especially against a aggressive CO.
Flop play could be like this against 2 villains, but most of the time I would go for a check/raise approach against the pre-flop aggressor for value and protection against the flush draw.

The rest of the hand seems pretty standard. No need to lead the river with in mind you could give villain room to make a bluff.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote