Skip to forum
[NL2-NL25] 6-max RF...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[NL2-NL25] 6-max RFI ranges

7 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
5,155 Views
LookAwayNow
Joined: 30.06.2011

I'd like to correctly construct RFI ranges for the micro 6-max cash-games. I am familiar with the PokerStrategy-ranges that can be found here: 6-max ranges

Above ranges are similar to what I use at the moment, but I feel like they might be outdated.

Recently I learned about the GTO-ranges for NL500 from GTOwizard, which are really good for NL100+.

Also I am familiar with the NL50-ranges they constructed where they take the heavy rake into account.

To start off I'd like to use the GTOwizard-ranges for NL50. From this point, how do we correctly adjust these ranges to beat the (massive) rake on micro's? And is rake the only thing, we want to adjust our ranges for?

What are your thoughts on this?


Reply
Quote
6 replies
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Playing GTO at NL 50 implies that other players are paying close attention
At those stakes, I think I would use the GTO ranges, and tighten up the bottom end — in other words, drop the weakest hands from the GTO range.

RFI ranges are only half the battle — knowing what the 3Bet/Fold and 3Bet/Call and 3Bet/Shove ranges become more important above about NL 10.
I was going to suggest that you have a look at the "Gameplan" series of articles, but they're for Gold and above.
See: https://www.pokerstrategy.com/strategy/bss/game-plan-introduction/


Reply
Quote
yangmartins
Joined: 28.11.2009

My recent knowledge only includes/applies to NL2->NL10. But allow me my 5cents and do what you think is best with my opinion (likely disregard it).

GTO targets to reduce your exploitability by villains, but considers there's a GTO alike opponent. What does it mean:
It means it designs a balanced range to play against a balanced range.

A little more detail, with specifics...
Imagine a BTN Vs BB situation. GTO considers a wide range for BTN to open. Consequently, it defends wide also, either by 3betting, or calling. Think about a 3bet defense...
If BTN GTO opens wide, BB GTO will 3bet light, thus BTN GTO can 4bet a little lighter than usual, or call wider also (frequency should be considered).

Now, try to apply this in NL2 game...NL2 has a very polarised pool. Tight players will 3 bet you tight regardless of position, whales can 3bet/shove loose. You need to know what player you have in the blind, before you consider the action. You can't apply ine-size-fits-all GTO OR.

First, focus on trying to expand/reduce common OR charts against specific opponent types. Only when you get to a situation where most of the players are regs, you need to start balancing your range and that's when, I'm, GTO comes as a necessity.

I am very interested in 3nduranc3 opinion in this, as I think he's running a 90%+ GTO play challenge and started in NL2, currently in NL5.


Reply
Quote
LookAwayNow
Joined: 30.06.2011

Thanks a lot for your reply yangmartins. That makes a lot of sense and helps a lot. I just got back into poker and realised a lot has changed during my absence.

Originally posted by yangmartins
First, focus on trying to expand/reduce common OR charts against specific opponent types. Only when you get to a situation where most of the players are regs, you need to start balancing your range and that's when, I'm, GTO comes as a necessity.

This. Exactly this is what I should be doing. There's no reason to be balanced on micro's at all and we just want to play as exploitative as possible to maximize our win-rate and get out of micro's asap.


Reply
Quote
Rhodriguez
Joined: 01.10.2006