Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL 50 SH Q9s

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
22 Views

Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;Hero$155.35:///////;CO$195.40:79/29 /24 /2.3/21 /53 /75 /33 ;[/tg]
0.5/1 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Elephant 0.69 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q♥, 9♥
2 folds, CO raises to $3.00, BU folds, Hero raises to $10.00, BB folds, CO calls $7.00.

Flop: ($21.00) A♠, 5♦, 4♦ (2 players)
Hero bets $13.00, CO calls $13.00.

Turn: ($47.00) T♠ (2 players)
Hero bets $27.00, CO calls $27.00.

River: ($101.00) A♦ (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $145.40 (All-In), Hero folds.

Final Pot: $246.40

I'd 3bet him a couple of hands before so i probably shouldn't have done it again. He had a very high ft3bet over a small smaple size but i think his range was pretty wide. Now i look again the 2nd barrel was probably only to get him off pocket pairs. Profitable play or no?


2 replies

players usually are not calling pp-s with Ax board, so I´d c/f turn


Bierbaer
Joined: 27.05.2005

Yeah without further reads i think it's ok to c/f on the turn.

If you want to try get him off of his hand i'd plan on barreling turn and river (non-diamond rivers at least).

And i'd set up stacksizes a bit better so the rivershove is at least a tiny bit smaller than a potsized bet, so I'd make it 14 on the flop and 31 on the turn.

On the river there are 111 in the pot and you can shove it in with 101 left.
(i hope i didn't miscalculate).

But w/o further reads it's a thin play and c/f on the turn is perfectly fine, too, imo.