Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL50 SH AQ in 3-bet pot without initiative

9 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
232 Views

Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

Play hand

$0.25/$0.5 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)

Known players:
[tg]BU$52.10:///////;SB$56.25:///////;BB$59.20:///////;MP3$12.05:///////;CO(Hero)$51.85:///////;[/tg]

Preflop: Hero is CO with A:h, Q:c.
MP3 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, BU raises to $4.50, 2 folds, Hero calls $3.00.

Flop: ($9.75) 6:d, T:h, J:d (2 players)
Hero checks, BU bets $6.50,

Villain is a 14/10 with 8.3% 3-bet over 30 hands.

I'm so unsure of how to play in 3-bet pots. I assume I should just c/f here and wait for a better board, like the nut flush or a TPTK or something like that. Do I have any options in this particular hand apart from folding?


8 replies

Fold preflop, calling any raise out of position is always a bad idea. Look at this hand from villains perspective - he is in a perfect spot. He has far more information about your hand than you have about his. He has position on you, he has initiative and can often take it down with a continuation bet. You have put your opponent in the spot you should be trying to put yourself into.


Alan883
Joined: 03.12.2008

3-bet range of his does not give any information to us. In such a small amount of hands.

I really hate when villian 3 bets on my AQ. Only reads and probably A can help us:)

I really took in consideration villians 3bet range. And if 3 bet range is 3 or less i am folding those hands OOP for sure.


Him 3-betting in the BTN vs me in the CO is indeed a good spot for him. But doesn't folding AQ here seem a bit too weak? I mean that would equal folding such a huge part of my range. I don't think too many people would exploit this at these stakes, but still, AQ is a pretty strong hand.


call pf is fine, if player is 3-betting with 8,3%, against some aggressive players you can even 4-bet and call shove with AQ
I´d float this board, since if he has random air, AK or smt like 88 then it is very reasonable that he´d either c/c or c/f turn and then after c/c would c/f close to 90% after you shove river


Alan883
Joined: 03.12.2008

Villain is a 14/10 with 8.3% 3-bet over 30 hands.

but we have only 30 hands. We really dont know about his 3 bet range after 30 hands.


with all due respect to Kaitz20, his analysis assumes we have position. As we don't, it's much better to fold pre. As played, fold flop - we cannot float oop effectively. Villain can 2nd bullet with AQ, AK, or weak made hands for value (as our play hints a draw). Also we have just 3 outs to nuts and terrible reverse implied if we hit Kd / any Q or A.


Originally posted by ccookie
with all due respect to Kaitz20, his analysis assumes we have position. As we don't, it's much better to fold pre. As played, fold flop - we cannot float oop effectively. Villain can 2nd bullet with AQ, AK, or weak made hands for value (as our play hints a draw). Also we have just 3 outs to nuts and terrible reverse implied if we hit Kd / any Q or A.

yes, my mistake.
I thought we were ip.
oop I´d likely would just either fold or turn my hand into bluff and 4-bet pf.
If player is really 3-bet happy then call is not terrbile pf, since we´re often dominate his range, Axs hands, QJ+, KJs+, so if we hit top pair, we have easy decision going all-in postflop.


Since he was an unknown I agree with you all, 4-bet bluff or folding pre do seem to be the better alternatives here. It's really hard to do anything else than burning money post-flop in this scenario... Thanks!


Share: