Did I make a misread?

I would most likely fold the turn on the pot size bet. You have 8 outs for a straight and 2 of them could be dirty.
You doesn't get the right prize to hit the straight. On the river you hit the nut straight, but the flush comes as well.
I would go for it as well. If villain has a flush this would be nasty, but that's 1 of the reasons I don't call the turn bet.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Originally posted by SDK1987
I would most likely fold the turn on the pot size bet. You have 8 outs for a straight and 2 of them could be dirty.
You doesn't get the right prize to hit the straight. On the river you hit the nut straight, but the flush comes as well.
I would go for it as well. If villain has a flush this would be nasty, but that's 1 of the reasons I don't call the turn bet.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Would you call against a simple TPTK?

You mean on the turn? I wouldn't call at all with any draw on the turn on a pot size bet.
Maybe if you had 7♠:6♠: I would play it differently, but than I would most likely go for a stack off on the flop.

Originally posted by SDK1987
You mean on the turn? I wouldn't call at all with any draw on the turn on a pot size bet.
Maybe if you had 7♠:6♠: I would play it differently, but than I would most likely go for a stack off on the flop.

According to solver, you should never fold on turn. Surprising huh? I know. I am too.

Turn size bet is too big to call. You have about 17% equity if villain has a set,

Do I think villain would c/r flop then lead with a fd- maybe you said he was a rec

Originally posted by mkBISCUIT
Turn size bet is too big to call. You have about 17% equity if villain has a set,

Do I think villain would c/r flop then lead with a fd- maybe you said he was a rec

Solver calls 100% of the time on turn. However, I'm starting to think that solver calculates that way because it can see the opponent's hand. lmao

Turn call is risky with 2 flushdraws. You could justifie it but you need huge implied odds. You should take all of his chips if you hit. Otherwise it's a losing call

Originally posted by NapoleonBonaparte135
Turn call is risky with 2 flushdraws. You could justifie it but you need huge implied odds. You should take all of his chips if you hit. Otherwise it's a losing call

It's a losing call vs range but not against AhKh specifically. Right?

Originally posted by Dr1fter808

Originally posted by mkBISCUIT
Turn size bet is too big to call. You have about 17% equity if villain has a set,

Do I think villain would c/r flop then lead with a fd- maybe you said he was a rec

Solver calls 100% of the time on turn. However, I'm starting to think that solver calculates that way because it can see the opponent's hand. lmao

reminder solvers are vs villains that play GTO as well. 50NL i dont see many playing GTO.. IMO

One thing that would improve solvers — have it reveal the range it is using for the opponent.

Originally posted by VorpalF2F
One thing that would improve solvers — have it reveal the range it is using for the opponent.

When you upload HH into solver like I did here for analysis, I believe solver is looking at the specific hand and not the range, so in a way, it doesn't tell us much because in real battles we go up against range not some AhKh.

Easy fold on the turn. Double suited reverse implies.
I think saying it's GTO and ignoring common sense is a surefire way to lose stacks.
GTO takes into account absolute optimal play on both parts. We have to defend a certain range otherwise we are exploited.
This isnt the case at micro stakes. Far from it.