trips vs full house

Seems well played, I am going broke here too. 3 combos of 77 on flop and 1 combo of A7. We redraw on K turns for sure. He has AQ/AJ/AT/A9/etc here. They don't fold trips vs aggression in these games on non flush/straight closing turns (assuming he doesn't have 85s or 53s, could be a bad assumption in these pools though lol). I wouldn't worry too much about being balanced here. Just bet/bet/bet. Might be able to debate turn sizing but I don't think it is a big deal here.

The sizing on the turn is way off - you are forcing all weaker hands to fold and only can get called by better. Make it smaller, you still protect enough versus draws on that paired board where not all their outs are clean. About 2/3 should be good enough - basically potting is very weak unless you have SOLID information that they simply cannot fold trips or draws for any price.

tx for the feedback!

Originally posted by Fanko
The sizing on the turn is way off - you are forcing all weaker hands to fold and only can get called by better. Make it smaller, you still protect enough versus draws on that paired board where not all their outs are clean. About 2/3 should be good enough - basically potting is very weak unless you have SOLID information that they simply cannot fold trips or draws for any price.

Nah, I disagree on this one.
No ace will fold here. And on NL5, there is a lot of pf overcalling with Ax hands.
After the flop bet, it's safe to say all Ax hands, 77 and some pocket pairs will call.
Against those, the sizing on the turn doesn't really matter. Pocket pairs will fold anyway, the rest will call no matter what sizing.
Just get the money in like you did and go broke. Not much more you can do here.

That is just absurd. Weaker trips and draws would not call "no matter what sizing", that is simply not true. You want to give them at least somewhat reasonable price, not push them off the hand. You have position vs SB (who is the prime target here), you can play easily on the river, there is no need to bet like that - make it like 2-3 and keep the weaker part of his range in.

Originally posted by Fanko
That is just absurd. Weaker trips and draws would not call "no matter what sizing", that is simply not true. You want to give them at least somewhat reasonable price, not push them off the hand. You have position vs SB (who is the prime target here), you can play easily on the river, there is no need to bet like that - make it like 2-3 and keep the weaker part of his range in.

Well, any reasonable sizing is what I mean. I should have been more specific.
But I am sure that it doesn't matter a lot here if you bet 40% or 80% pot.
Betsizes on the micro's have very easy rules. Bet big for value, bluff small.