6-Max

As a general rule, as you reduce the number of players at a table, winrates become higher but so does variance.

It depends totally on your play style though. You might well crush full ring but struggle at 6-max.

Hmm.. interesting, been playing FR for a while with a TAG style around 15/13 type. I might give it a shot.

It'd take some getting used to. 15/13 would be super-nitty at 6max.

Out of interest, what are your button/cutoff/hijack VPIP/PFR numbers at full ring?

Let me grab that:

Those are some of my stats, all played at NL2.

Wow, not sure why I can't post an image.

BU: 30/26
CO: 21/19
MP+2: 13/11
MP+1: 12/10
MP: 11/10
UTG+1: 9/8
UTG: 8/8
BB: 10/6
SB: 14/9

BU and CO seems fine, but in the rest of the positions you seems way too nitty imo.

I agree, I even think that I can open a bit more wider from CO and BU profitably. I've been playing with a robotic approache for the past years, it works fine in NL2-5, but if my goal is to move up I think I have to cut-down the number of tables and try to play a bit more actively..

Another question is, how does zoom compared to regular tables in terms of WR given you feel okay with both?

Zoom is way nittier from my experience, so win rates will be smaller.

Hmmm. That's what I thought. Thanks man, I'll try playing SH..