Skip to forum
Pointers for moving...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Pointers for moving up to 5nl

21 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
3,432 Views
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Hi all,

Started back playing after taking a break for a while, i started with a $20BR on 2nl 6max zoom stars. I wanted to play 20k hands to get back in to the swing of things and then post my stats for pointers. I played 19k then swapped over to regular full ring 2nl tables where i have been just playing off fish at the tables.

I am almost rolled for a shot at 5nl and would appreciate if you could look over my hm2 to see what stands out as a problem or potential problem at my current stakes or for the shot at 5nl.

I feel i have been playing well over this small sample with the odd exception i made a stupid call when i figured i was behind etc.

Graph

Stats

By Position


Reply
Quote
20 replies
CharlotteD
Joined: 04.02.2013

You can take a shot at 5nl and move back after losing 2 or 3 buyins for example. I think your bankroll is only 13 buyins or so, which is too small, but taking a shot can speed up things too.

Good luck!


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

I’m at $80 with rale back and bonus, I’m going to take a shot When I’m at $100

Thanks for reply 😁


Reply
Quote
arthurbentley
Joined: 12.10.2010

You happened to be on my table for a few orbits and left after stacking a fish. Ratholing isn't good etiquette you know. :f_biggrin:

I only have 50 hands on you but it is clear you know how to value bet a calling station.


Reply
Quote

That red line looks too level for 2nl imo, i would say play more loose passive but i doubt anyone would agree. I would call more with suited connected cards and try and snap off overplayed top pairs and stuff, ive played plenty of hands at 2nl and 5nl and done ok, with a over20 vpip and a 15 pfr.

What site you playing at?


Reply
Quote
JnB90
Joined: 20.03.2020

The stats u are providing are not accurate enough to really tell what’s going on.. pls post RFI stats for each pos the W$WSF and the 3BetvsIP and OOP etc.
For what I can see for now:
Your WTSD% is pretty high, meaning you are to passive postflop (but this could be a pool exploit)


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

I would never πŸ˜‚ table must have dried up πŸ˜‚

Originally posted by arthurbentley
You happened to be on my table for a few orbits and left after stacking a fish. Ratholing isn't good etiquette you know. :f_biggrin:

I only have 50 hands on you but it is clear you know how to value bet a calling station.


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Originally posted by RngJoker
That red line looks too level for 2nl imo, i would say play more loose passive but i doubt anyone would agree. I would call more with suited connected cards and try and snap off overplayed top pairs and stuff, ive played plenty of hands at 2nl and 5nl and done ok, with a over20 vpip and a 15 pfr.

What site you playing at?

Playing on stars


Reply
Quote

a 11bb winrate is good for 2nl


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Originally posted by RngJoker
a 11bb winrate is good for 2nl[/quote


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Originally posted by JnB90
The stats u are providing are not accurate enough to really tell what’s going on.. pls post RFI stats for each pos the W$WSF and the 3BetvsIP and OOP etc.
For what I can see for now:
Your WTSD% is pretty high, meaning you are to passive postflop (but this could be a pool exploit)

I have been working on cbet, and valuebetting postflop to try to increase my aggression.

I will repost my positional stats graph with included stats when I get home


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Originally posted by RngJoker
a 11bb winrate is good for 2nl

The fish there at the minute is inbelievable I have I’d say 4-5 of 9 marked fish every table and I’m talkig 60/0 with ranging aggression which I try to use to my advantage


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Positional graph updated


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

i have been looking through my db and found i am losing money when i call a bet on the river.

Its a buy in below 0 but i feel it should be higher? or is sample size an issue here?

Or am i just not giving a bet enough credit?


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Hi MrMontanaRC,
Look for a stat called "River Call Efficiency" -- it specifically addresses your situation.

I know it exists in PT4

In general, If you think you should have folded, you're probably right :coolface:

Best of luck :gl:,
VS


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Originally posted by VorpalF2F
Hi MrMontanaRC,
Look for a stat called "River Call Efficiency" -- it specifically addresses your situation.

I know it exists in PT4

In general, If you think you should have folded, you're probably right :coolface:

Best of luck :gl:,
VS

It’s at 1.24 overall, it’s 1.59 from button but higher in ep

I’m calling too many river bets on bad boards with my mid pairs etc?


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

No, as I understand it, your numbers are in the right range.
If it is < 1 then you're bleeding cash on the river.

If it is over 2, then you're missing a lot of good opportunities.

That is from memory though...

This thread has more information:
https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=440434


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

I presume this stat would be lower than my full ring due to the majority of my hands being zoom?

Thanks 😁


Reply
Quote
MrMontanaRC
Joined: 22.10.2016

Originally posted by VorpalF2F
No, as I understand it, your numbers are in the right range.
If it is < 1 then you're bleeding cash on the river.

If it is over 2, then you're missing a lot of good opportunities.

That is from memory though...

This thread has more information:
https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=440434/blockquote >

Comment above


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

I wouldn't know what the difference between zoom and FR would be.
I think that lower just means that over the hands covered by the stats you called a bit wider.

As long as it is in the right range, I wouldn't worry about it.


Reply
Quote