Originally posted by William340
I know I am late to the party, but I always interpreted "not being results oriented" differently.
I looked at it on more of a hand by hand or even decision by decision basis.
did you make the right play given the information available.
if "yes", then you are playing well, even if the immediate result was bad.
(say the fish sucked out, or the LAGtard was at the top of his range).
if "no", then you are playing poorly, even if you are winning.
(you suck out after getting in way behind, or your poorly conceived bluff somehow works)
in this case there was a good result, but your play was bad.I never thought that it could/should be interpreted as not caring about whether you won or lost (overall) in the long term.
I'll think about it before, but I'm fairly certain I'm right and you're wrong.
![]()
This makes sense.
I haven't played much this month, actually, but I'll pay attention.
Hand by hand I can pretty much tell when I've made a playing mistake, or just got unlucky. Most of the hands I post for evaluation are those where I win, but am worried I played badly.