So for anyone who doesn't already know Sklansky's theory goes that when you play different to how you would if you could see your opponents cards you make a mistake, and when they play differently, they make a mistake.
What if you were up against an opponent who starts going all in every hand? A few hands later you have KK, and call, and he turns over AA. According to Sklansky, this call would be a mistake. But clearly if you look at it on a logical level, folding KK to an opponent who is shoving every hand is definitely a mistake.
Does this mean Sklansky's theorem is results oriented?
