Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Last years zoom graph, mostly NL25 with about 50k hands NL10.
I consider myself not very good, so I think it is definitely beatable.
I would not play on Party though because of the rake.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Last years zoom graph, mostly NL25 with about 50k hands NL10.
I consider myself not very good, so I think it is definitely beatable.
I would not play on Party though because of the rake.
Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
Zoom/rush is def beatable and I'm ~5bb/100 winner here over like 500k hands sample various stakes and I suck.However if rake on party fast fold tables in bb/100 is as ridic as on regular tables then I doubt it's beatable. Mayybe if you're extremely awesome you could squeeze out a few bb wr.
![]()
surely you don't suck that much...
You must have learned some things over your half a million hands experience
Originally posted by Yordi85
so partypoker is nightmarepoker ifit is about rake?
Apparently.
I've been playing there for a while now, but i'm not too knowledgeable on rake.
I'm switching to Uni-bet verrrr soon (30% rakeback+deposit bonus, sounds good!)
I played it this summer.
Winner on nl25 6.5bb/100 over 70k sample.
And all that without hud .
So its deffo beatable
Not that I'm beating it cos I haven't played much lately, but from reading around, it seems like the key is playing looser and speculative hands cos everyone else waits around for big PPs. Just get the small wins such as steals and cbet takedowns, and avoid the losses until you can break the big hands
People arent waiting for premiums at anything above NL10 I would assume. And opening hands that would normally be -ev will net you same result against reasonable opponents. Because ofc nobody is going to pass up spots where they can exploit your wide ranges by applying pressure with superior ranges/position.
Btw isn't rake pretty much the same on unibet as on party?
Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
People arent waiting for premiums at anything above NL10 I would assume. And opening hands that would normally be -ev will net you same result against reasonable opponents. Because ofc nobody is going to pass up spots where they can exploit your wide ranges by applying pressure with superior ranges/position.Btw isn't rake pretty much the same on unibet as on party?
Altho as its fast folds a lot of outsole probably won't pick up on the wider range.
Buy yeah I dunno about anything above nl10
Hey all
New to the forum!
Does anyone play on the ipoker steed tables? I moved over from stars to ipoker yesterday ( only playing 20nl currently) and they seem alot more agro?
Originally posted by PAYMYLOANS
Hey allNew to the forum!
Does anyone play on the ipoker steed tables? I moved over from stars to ipoker yesterday ( only playing 20nl currently) and they seem alot more agro?
I play at NL5/10 I even noticed quite a step in aggro at nl10 which surprised me, unless I was just running in to the top of ranges all the time
Originally posted by bennisboy
Originally posted by PAYMYLOANS
Hey allNew to the forum!
Does anyone play on the ipoker steed tables? I moved over from stars to ipoker yesterday ( only playing 20nl currently) and they seem alot more agro?
I play at NL5/10 I even noticed quite a step in aggro at nl10 which surprised me, unless I was just running in to the top of ranges all the time
Im playing at 20nl just now. The main difference from stars is the 40bb shortstachers all 3betting like 10-15%. ive just started shoving on them with any pair ajo+ a10s+ and getting alot of folds ♦