Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[SH] NL4 AJo 07-04-13

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
222 Views

IPoker, $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

MP: $6.10 (152.5 bb)
CO: $1 (25 bb)
BTN: $5.73 (143.3 bb)
SB: $4.73 (118.3 bb)
Hero (BB): $5.29 (132.3 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with A J
MP folds, CO raises to $0.12, 2 folds, Hero raises to $5.29 and is all-in, CO calls $0.88 and is all-in

Flop: ($2.02) J Q Q (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Turn: ($2.02) Q (2 players, 2 are all-in)
River: ($2.02) 9 (2 players, 2 are all-in)

I assume this is fine against a shortstack?
If I had made a smaller bet I would be commited anyways, and I stand a better chance right here right now.

Villain:


Reply
Quote
2 replies
sausage646
Joined: 30.03.2010

The one and the big reason why I would recommend you making a 3bet than ship the stack is that if you ship in the stack -> he can't bluff, but if you 3bet (it should be less than your standard) you give him a chance to try bluffing you some times + the AI move looks much stronger than your 3bet.

One thing you should keep in mind is that if he is constantly auto re-buying to 1$ (25bb) he might not be some random short stacked fish but a guy who plays after 'short stack strategy' and in that case you should look up how they play after 'short stack strategy' and adopt accordingly.

I know I had played against few of those 'short stack strategy' guys a few months earlier basically the guy opened to 0.12 and was playing like 15+ tables or something so I did 3bet him each time to ~24 and so he folded almost in every cases and in some went AI but since my 3bet was so small it was really profitable + he didn't adapted.


Reply
Quote

Hello,

I think that we can consider 3betting smaller - like $0.26, so we can have a bluff range as well.
If we 3bet shove here we should stick to a solid value range and we can never bluff 3bet something like K2.

Best,
Plamen


Reply
Quote