Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

6max hyper: 2nd pair vs river shove

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
158 Views
dydukas
Joined: 01.05.2009

PokerStars - $6.71+$0.29|15/30 Ante 3 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

UTG: 449 (VPIP: 23.04, PFR: 21.19, 3Bet Preflop: 8.55, Hands: 2,146)
MP: 476 (VPIP: 23.53, PFR: 11.90, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 52)
Hero (CO): 572
BTN: 406 (VPIP: 28.30, PFR: 26.67, 3Bet Preflop: 22.73, Hands: 109)
SB: 648 (VPIP: 46.73, PFR: 36.76, 3Bet Preflop: 13.73, Hands: 228)
BB: 449 (VPIP: 25.21, PFR: 22.31, 3Bet Preflop: 8.86, Hands: 1,896)

6 players post ante of 3, SB posts SB 15, BB posts BB 30

Pre Flop: (pot: 63) Hero has 9♥ A♦

fold, fold, Hero raises to 61, fold, SB calls 46, fold

Flop: (170, 2 players) 2♥ Q♣ 9♠
SB checks, Hero checks

Turn: (170, 2 players) 5♦
SB checks, Hero bets 85, SB calls 85

River: (340, 2 players) 7♦
SB bets 499 and is all-in, Hero calls 423 and is all-in

Is it ok to not cbet vs aggressive unknown to keep the pot smaller? And can I call river here?


Reply
Quote
2 replies
kurrkabin
Joined: 12.10.2010

If he snap bets river or bets quickly I am just as fast as being over with this hand.

Honestly, I think you rather fold here. Price is too big, very often that's value. I know river doesn't seem like scary card, but my feeling is telling it's value when fish does take this line. He can easily have 97 there, even 77, or 57.

Think of it- if he wanted to bluff you, wouldn't he bet turn once you checked behing? Or c/r or whatever, you know, but certainly not c/c with the intention of shoving river when there ain't that many draws he could have missed.

I am ok with betting the flop just cuz his range is so wide that it's not just Qx and JTs that he's gonna have there. Our hand wouldn't mind a bit of protection. Checking behind is also fine. We have a good mid pair on a rainbow board, 1 over, not so much to be scared of.


Reply
Quote
dydukas
Joined: 01.05.2009

Excellent answer. If there was a feedback option here I'd give it max :)


Reply
Quote