Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

How bad a call did I make?

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
262 Views

Pacific, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

CO: $1.60 (80 bb) (65/0/4.5/0, hands 20) agg% river = 33%, limps 77%)
Hero (BTN): $2 (100 bb)
SB: $2 (100 bb)
BB: $2.22 (111 bb)
UTG: $1.25 (62.5 bb)
MP: $3.73 (186.5 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BTN with A Q
2 folds, CO calls $0.02, Hero raises to $0.08, 2 folds, CO calls $0.06

Flop: ($0.19) 2 5 5 (2 players)
CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($0.19) 4 (2 players)
CO checks, Hero checks

River: ($0.19) Q (2 players)
CO bets $0.50, Hero calls $0.50

Results:

Spoiler

$1.19 pot ($0.07 rake)
Final Board: 2 5 5 4 Q
CO showed 5 9 and won $1.12 ($0.54 net)
Hero showed A Q and lost (-$0.58 net)


Reply
Quote
3 replies
Oly0909
Joined: 08.06.2008

Hi lupara,

I don't see anything wrong in your call.

Best regards!


Reply
Quote

Looks like a fish, but then again which worse hands would he bet 2.5x pot with ?


Reply
Quote
mbml
Joined: 27.11.2008

Hi.

Such a weird spot. You are at the top of your range which should make you want to call this vs villain's overbet.

But villain's stats point out to him being some passive fish. And passive fish don't ever overbet as a bluff. If you have reads on him being an aggro fish then I think you have to call here with such a strong hand.

Your postflop sample is insignificant, so only your VPIP/PFR over 20 hands could be somewhat meaningful. 65/0 indicates that he is loose (playing 65% of starting hands) and passive (never raising with the hands he chooses to play with).

As such, by making such an inference from his basic stats, I think this is a fold.

Thanks.


Reply
Quote