Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL10 SH, 3-bet pot with QQ

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
232 Views
dienaszaglis
Joined: 12.06.2008

$0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
PokerStars
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
HERO (UTG) ($13.91) 139bb
UTG+1 ($10) 100bb 20/8, 3B: 9, AF: 0.7, 50h
CO ($4.10) 41bb
BTN ($9.03) 90bb
SB ($12.42) 124bb
BB ($15.65) 157bb

Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) HERO is UTG Q♦ Q♥
HERO raises to $0.30, UTG+1 raises to $0.80, 4 folds, HERO calls $0.50

Flop: 7♥ 3♥ 4♦ ($1.75, 2 players)
HERO checks, UTG+1 bets $1.10, HERO calls $1.10

Turn: J♥ ($3.95, 2 players)
HERO checks, UTG+1 checks

River: 9♦ ($3.95, 2 players)
HERO checks, UTG+1 bets $2.80, HERO?

PRE
Villain is not 3-betting too often and vs UTG OR his range probably is QQ+/AK.

FLOP
Stats suggest, that he`s passive and probably would not c-bet with AK. Except A:hK:h.
So, should I fold right here?

TURN
Plan is to c/f.

RIVER
I think it`s a fold, he`s not bluffing here.


Reply
Quote
2 replies

Hi Diena,

Preflop: It's a really small sample to decide if he 3-bets a lot or not however he does seem to be on the tighter side in this sample.

As far as postflop goes you should ask yourself why you called to begin with. If you think his range is that strong you called for set mining given his small 3-bet so postflop, as tight as it may seem, we would fold if we don't hit a set. As played river is a fold.


Reply
Quote
MareksVas
Joined: 06.06.2009

I would put him on little wider 3bet range, QQ+,AK seems to tight.
I would also x/c flop.But since he checks turn,I would have called his river bet. Don't you think he would bluff his AK,AQ there?


Reply
Quote