Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL100 FR - AA, valuebetting the river

12 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
111 Views
Faye6891
Joined: 09.11.2007

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

BB ($59.90)
UTG ($191.90)
UTG+1 ($18.50)
MP1 ($98.75)
MP2 ($102.20)
Hero (MP3) ($102)
CO ($20)
Button ($50)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with A, A
1 fold, MP1 calls $1, MP2 calls $1, Hero raises to $6, 3 folds, UTG calls $5, MP1 calls $5, 1 fold

Flop: ($19.50) J, 10, Q (3 players)
UTG checks, MP1 checks, Hero bets $14, 1 fold, MP1 calls $14

Turn: ($47.50) 3 (2 players)
MP1 checks, Hero bets $30, MP1 calls $30

River: ($107.50) 2 (2 players)
MP1 checks, Hero bets $52 (All-In), MP1 calls $48.75 (All-In)

Total pot: $205 | Rake: $3

Flop and Turn are standard IMO.

On the river, I think he might be on a busted draw or maybe something like AQ or KQ. I think hands better than AA are very unlikely judging by the way he played the hand.

So I decided to put him all-in, he's probably not folding a Q if he called up to this point.

Did I oversee something or is the valuebet on the river OK?


11 replies
HoofdVogel
Joined: 11.01.2008

flop i would bet ~16$ or maybe more; to many hands you don't wanna see

river without stats i probaply check/behind but i think the riverbet is ok.


cindy1985
Joined: 13.11.2007

If he is the passive type of player, you don't beat that much here. He could call you down to the turn with Axs, 99+, JTo, QTo, KJs, KQo. He is folding all the hands you beat except KQ and AQ maybe, that is ~10% of his range. He is probably calling with two pairs or better and end up winning the whole pot 60% of the time. So your equity might be something like:

EVshove = 10%*100BB+30%*50BB-60%*100BB << EV check behind

If he is some sort of a TAG, well I don't see what hands he could possibly play this way... maybe AQ but he would definitely not pay the river bet.

So I would check behind.


TribunCaesar
Joined: 29.04.2007

I bet $16 on the flop, something like 35 on the turn and then I have an easy shove on the river. As played it depends on the type of opponent. Against a passive nit I check, against a tag or fish I shove, he is not going to fold AQ or KQ here after calling me twice.

Best regards,
TribunCaesar


Faye6891
Joined: 09.11.2007

Yeah, I guess I could've made my bets a little bit bigger, that's true.

Oh, I forgot to say, villain is unknown here.

@cindy: I think it's very unlikely he'd play two pair or better checking all three streets, don't you think? (unless he's very passive, but he's unknown here.)


cindy1985
Joined: 13.11.2007

well I guess you're right, I'm on a 7BI downswings, guess it is why I was inclined to check behind and see monsters everywhere :)

Against an unknown I still think I check behind, only huge fish would call three streets of bet with a queen here, don't you think? Then you should have this read to value bet river.


TribunCaesar
Joined: 29.04.2007

As played, yes. If you bet more on earlier streets just shove it.


Faye6891
Joined: 09.11.2007

Originally posted by cindy1985
Against an unknown I still think I check behind, only huge fish would call three streets of bet with a queen here, don't you think? Then you should have this read to value bet river.

True, I didn't have any reads there. But IMO he's most likely on a busted draw or a Q after checking to me on the river.

If he's on a busted draw he's folding anyway (unless he's very stupid... and yes, I've seen a player stupid enough to call pushes on the river with busted draws... but just once... unfortunately :P).

If he's on a Q he's probably not calling (unless he's a big fish as you said), but I have to give him the opportunity to make a mistake here, and the only way to do so is to bet.

Well, that's what I think... that and the fact that it's really unlikely he's holding a better hand made me shove there. What do you think? Would like to hear your thoughts about it.

@Tribun: Oh, your thoughts as well too.

OFF-TOPIC@Cindy: Downswing huh? I know what that feels like, went through a 14BI one last month, even had to go down to NL50. But now I'm back to NL100 and winning. :)


Pot is big, he won´t play better hand to c/c all three streets, so you´re ahead here probably 99% times. So I don´t see no reason why not to shove river for value. Let him to make hero call with QK or some other hand.


with 2 pairs vs aggressor on such board i would also just call u. it depends on your stats but he can put you on JJ+ with such preflop raise and ofcourse if u got set or you wont slowplay it in such flop. really depends on the oponent and ofcourse on ur stats


cindy1985
Joined: 13.11.2007

well I like your argument, we have to give our opponents the opportunity to make mistakes. Also if he folds no one would know your hands, which is kind of a good thing too.

Still, like silent21 said, someone holding JT/QT/QJ might call you PF and call you down (afraid of trips, str8, or trying to trap - since you doubled barrel he probably hopes somehow you're going to fire again), and this it is a big part of his calling range. So if you exclude busted draw, I really think you don't beat such a big part of his "calling the river" range.

off topic: I'm on a huge downswing now, somewhere near 12BI, I might have some tilt issue as well (in particular with TT type of hands :)) probably cause I've loosen up PF way too much, I'm going back to some nitty stats soon :)


Thorsten77
Joined: 28.05.2006

I agree with TribunCaesar in such that you should bet more on prev. streets - then its an easy shove. In this spot, I'd shove against a station, but not against a solid reg. What do you think will call us here? His range is comprised of a) pure draws (OESDs and FDs), b) Combodraws and c) 2 pairs.

a) no hand will call a shove...
b) Hands like T9,J9 won't call. AQ,KQ will call, but those hands are not very likely given the preflop limps. KJ/AJ may call, but may also fold.
c) TJ,QJ,QT - all hands will call a shove - and beat you

To be a bet for value, we need more combinations that call and are worse than calling and beating us - I don't think this is given here.