This is such a good post to learn from.
There was superb advice provided by both Cannell & fongie, that is based on a lot of experience from a lot of people over a long period of time.
It's such a shame that their efforts to help others has not been listened to with the respect that they deserve.
Whilst every member is entitled to try out whichever route they prefer and to have their own opinions, imo a safer long term goal through hard work, patience and low risk strategy is always preferable to the high risk, low BR strategy adopted by the OP however good he/she maybe.
I don't doubt that the OP is a good player, I actually agree with them that this was luck (a downswing) that was the problem, but with such a low BR/high table stakes ratio, luck plays a much more significant part than skill and he/she didn't stand a chance.
I have sufficient BR now & lots of additional cash available to invest to play NL200 or NL500 if I so desired, but currently grinding NL10 (and proud of it). Afterall, learning SO much which can only be beneficial when/if I decide to step up.
Why run and get all sweaty when you can walk and take in the view.
Above all have fun, whatever you choose to do.
oooh that rhymed, must be a poet although i didn't know it lol ♦
Bart.
p.s. Just in case I too get shouted at, for the record, the PokerStrategy registration date is just what it says it is, most players have been playing poker a lot longer. The PokerStrategy status just indicates current playing activity on the linked poker site and not overall experience across all poker sites.