hands / limp/fold / bb
vpip/pfr / co/btn/sb steal / 3betvsBTN/vsSB
Hi!
How deep FGS should I use here? The CO will definetley not use his stack enough and could call looser because he seems a fishy guy. So i feel like i should call here by depth=1, but depth=3 i can call K9s+.
What is your analysing method here about the correct range, considerin FGS depth?
Thanks, elekadammate
you will get less accuracy the more deep you go.
I would stick to depth 1 with all calculations and make adjustments from that answer if you have further information for hands further into the future. it is better to learn FGS for depth 1 and just use your judgement to go further if needed in game. IMO
Originally posted by lessthanthreee
you will get less accuracy the more deep you go.
I didn't know that. What is the reason of less accuracy?
Well FGS assumes that all players will play with nash ranges in all future hands. This is usually not going to happen especially with recreational players in table.
E.g. blinds hitting might not have that big impact with recreational big stack player who might be way more passive than nash ranges would assume.
Oh, thank you, I thought that the model's accuracy (the calculating process) is volatile.
In this situation CO and BTN are passive players, so i will win less money with folding in the future, so i should call this hand, in my opinion.
What you think? K6s is a call or fold?
if the players behind you are passive you can push wider in the future. This would make me tighter in the current hand. I would probably call this vs a reg but fold vs an unknown.
FGS becomes less accurate the more turns you evaluate because there are more variables to consider (most of which you can not estimate accurately).
Originally posted by lessthanthreee
FGS becomes less accurate the more turns you evaluate because there are more variables to consider (most of which you can not estimate accurately).
Thank you! This makes sense.
