Great poll!
Why don't you just make the options:
A. Should we get much more than we get now?
B. Should we get more than we get now?
C. Should we get the same as we get now?
Clearly, option B. is better for you than A. and both are better than the status quo.
If you'd been more direct and just asked: "Please give us more money for TaF", then I'd have replied:
"TaF is a kind of affiliate program, and it is quite one of the best around. PokerStrategy.com offers an easy way to get some bucks while offering a good thing to your friends, and if you have a website etc. its a good way to monetize your traffic.
Why so?
1. It is better because its a value for the ones you suggest it to. Its not just trying to get some of your friends to waste their money - you can earn money while they do, too.
2. Because of that, we bear your risk. We give your friend $50. We give you $10 at a point of time where he just played a few hands. We give you another $15 when he did not nearly cover our initial $50 cost. And still, you can earn more once he reaches 5,000 StrategyPoints."
I'm pretty sure that TaF belongs to the best, most transparent and most valuable affiliate programs around. It's fair, it's the same for eveyone. And it indeed is already expensive.