QQ vs Fish

You should not bet the river here. I like it as played.

Well played. Villain can call down with weak Kx and he has plenty of those in his range. I don't like the idea of betting 3 streets.

Originally posted by LoBrue
@ the Turn I think he would bet a hittet King and any hittet set.

As I said in another hand you posted, many players don't donk much and almost always check to the aggressor. That means that we shouldn't change our range expectations just because he checked, he can have all the hands that he called flop with. I would use this check as information only if I have seen him use the donk turn line before.
Hand itself is played fine, the other option being check back flop and then bet twice if he checks turn. In this case his checking turn would mean something because we can reasonably expect him to bet stronger hands for value after we checked flop. Your line is best against passive fish because we want to get the value from draws and weak hands before scary cards come and checking back is better against aggressive players who will start bluffing (we don't fold turn of course).

Against a fishy player I would anytime seeks for 2 streets of value on such boards. There's not much draws, but they like to stick with their weak pairs and sometimes even with Ax. So betting flop and turn or flop and river should be our standard line on these dry boards. WP Imo:f_love: