It is highly unlikely and you said you believe he has a set.
Notifications
Clear all
I agree with one blocker (lessens) but with two blockers I strongly believe he has no ace.
Originally posted by scopinad
It is highly unlikely and you said you believe he has a set.
I said that sets can play this way but note: it was given the option if turn was a brick...
Originally posted by scopinad
I agree with one blocker (lessens) but with two blockers I strongly believe he has no ace.
You are wrong. There are 2 Aces out there and he can have 1...
Yes it is a bit more unlikely but still possible. Villain can x/r flop with AcQc and that is not blocker and is still in villains range. We can't discount that just because we hold AhAs. I don't know why is it relevant how many combos of those hands villain have in this case? He can x/r flop with 99-QQ,AcJc+, we can call because there is still draws and overpair but when villain shoves OTT it is clear that he hit his flush or wants to protect his sets from single club hands, we have to fold.
Originally posted by scopinad
I agree with one blocker (lessens) but with two blockers I strongly believe he has no ace.
Cmon.. With AJs+ there is 12 combos. We block 2 aces so he has 6 combos left.. That is half. You can't seriously say he can't have Ax when there is 2 aces left on the deck.. Are you saying that AA vs AA situations are impossible? I can tell you they are not.
Not only AAvsAA is possible. The forums are full of crying players how their AK faced AA. It is totally wrong to discount the Ace here...
Yes, discounting aces would be the same if you say you don't have any money on your bankroll because you lost half of it 