Party, $0.10/$0.25 Pot Limit Omaha Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
SB: $42.96 (171.8 bb)
BB: $25 (100 bb)
MP: $17.19 (68.8 bb)
CO: $26.24 (105 bb)
Hero (BTN): $46.62 (186.5 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with 6♣: A♠: 5♦: 4♠:
MP calls $0.25, CO folds, Hero raises to $1.10, SB raises to $3.80, 2 folds, Hero calls $2.70
Flop: ($8.10) 6♥: 3♥: 5♥: (2 players)
SB bets $3.85, Hero calls $3.85
Turn: ($15.80) K♥: (2 players)
SB bets $9, Hero calls $9
River: ($33.80) 9♠: (2 players)
SB bets $11, Hero calls $11
Results:
Spoiler
$55.80 pot ($2.79 rake)
Final Board: 6♥: 3♥: 5♥: K♥: 9♠:
SB showed T♦: A♥: A♣: 7♣: and lost (-$27.65 net)
Hero showed 6♣: A♠: 5♦: 4♠: and won $53.01 ($25.36 net)
Villain reg, highly aggressive postlop. Notes say: 'usually betting vs weakness/ defaults to betting' etc.
I'm very unsure how to handle such spots postflop. We don't block the nuts and therefore bluffcatching sucks hard. On the other hand must we really give up a 'hit' already on the flop?
Because of my notes I called until the river, intending to fold to a shove. (I guess the turn ok card in sense that it further reduces nutflush combos).
Otr, how do we go about devising a call down range vs a shove? Should it mostly be flushes (due to blocking) or can we call any other hands?
What do you think of villain's river line? For me, it didn't make much sense and I can't see any reason why the nf wouldn't shove. Given he surely shoves nf here, why can't he also shove nfblocker?