Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

(FR) QQ - slowplay?

9 Posts
4 Users
3 Reactions
1,327 Views
pguest
Joined: 01.04.2009

$0.02 NL - Holdem - 9 players

UTG: 35 BB (VPIP: 65.12, PFR: 2.33, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 43)
UTG+1: 108 BB (VPIP: 20.17, PFR: 11.60, 3Bet Preflop: 3.27, Hands: 600)
MP: 96 BB (VPIP: 10.00, PFR: 6.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 30)
MP+1: 100 BB (VPIP: 12.99, PFR: 9.15, 3Bet Preflop: 4.76, Hands: 154)
MP+2: 100 BB (VPIP: 22.39, PFR: 12.68, 3Bet Preflop: 2.94, Hands: 819)
CO: 23 BB (VPIP: 62.79, PFR: 6.98, 3Bet Preflop: 3.85, Hands: 43)
BTN: 279 BB (VPIP: 26.70, PFR: 18.69, 3Bet Preflop: 3.23, Hands: 400)
Hero (SB): 124.5 BB
BB: 173.5 BB (VPIP: 15.20, PFR: 12.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 126)

Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Q♣ Q♠

UTG calls 1 BB, UTG+1 calls 1 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, BTN calls 1 BB, Hero raises to 7 BB, fold, UTG calls 6 BB, fold, fold

Flop: (17 BB, 2 players) Q♥ 6♦ 2♣
Thoughts:

Spoiler

The safest board ever for a top set.
Does the line check behind flop and bet turn (or call bet turn) aka slowplay make any sense?

Hero bets 9.5 BB, fold

Spoiler

Hero wins 16 BB


Reply
Quote
8 replies
Alleen86
Joined: 27.05.2010

We can't check behind the flop because we are first to act. We can check and then fold, call or raise if he bets. Slowplaying this hand definitelly makes sense in some situations (when the opponent is aggressive, for example). UTG looks very loose/passive, so I wouldn't slowplay vs him if he was fullstacked. He is probably capable of calling three streets with worse hands, and we cant expect passive player to bet vs our check, so we are losing value with checking. Since he has just 28BB left, 2 streets will be enough to get all the money in, so it makes sense to check the flop and let him to hit something and/or be more ready to call later streets, thinking we are not that strong (i.e. we capped our range OTF).


Reply
Quote
pguest
Joined: 01.04.2009

Originally posted by Alleen86
We can't check behind the flop because we are first to act.

You're right. I missed the correct position, when I commented the hand.


Reply
Quote
DecMate
Joined: 25.01.2009

I'd rather just lead. He's probably calling all his pocket pairs that you might miss a street of value from if another overcard hits.
Think we could bet flop check turn as a better play.


Reply
Quote
DecMate
Joined: 25.01.2009

Then again it is NL2,.. 3 streets 😁


Reply
Quote
Tonyx86
Joined: 28.03.2018

Would u cbet with AJ or 99 on that board structure? For sure u will. Considering the fact it is NL2, we have to play straight forward, else we're loosing value.


Reply
Quote
Alleen86
Joined: 27.05.2010

I think you are all missing UTG's stack size. If we bet 2 streets a bit over 1/2, he will be all in. So with the absolute nuts on this bone dry board, I think it's better to check, let him improve OTT or let him think that we are weak so he can call us lighter (maybe bluff/value raise from time to time).


Reply
Quote
DecMate
Joined: 25.01.2009

Originally posted by Alleen86
I think you are all missing UTG's stack size.

I'll be quiet now:f_cool:


Reply
Quote
Alleen86
Joined: 27.05.2010

Originally posted by DecMate

Originally posted by Alleen86
I think you are all missing UTG's stack size.

I'll be quiet now:f_cool:

:f_biggrin:


Reply
Quote