Do I have to call this river x/raise?

I would not call small pockets for set value preflop. Stats also don't show us a villain who is overly nitty (we could call due to implied odds) or who is super maniac.

As played I can totaly understand not to raise the flop to keep his range wide. But since you called for set value you need to trust on that he will call a raise with AK, AA, maybe KQ. And I think these are the hands you are targeting. I would have raised the flop.

If raised the flop, turn is an ease bet.

As played I think it is a fold on the river. But I would have never been able to do so at the table.

I don't know what's going on at Ignition nowadays but 33 is a fold on UTG pre at PS.

I open from 66 but not even always.

As played, it's just a cooler. I would never fold anywhere.

Since the stacks are fairly deep, and the pre-flop 3Bet is small, you need to put in only $0.30 to win $6.00 which satisfies the call-20 rule-of-thumb.

OTF, when you hit, you can't be passive and allow any straight and flush draws free cards.
Note that your plan was to get it in by the river.
Start on the flop -- if you get folds fine.
If he calls with the worst odds, fine -- more money for you.
If he hits by the river -- and he will a certain percentage of the time -- just move on.

You are better than 5:1 favourite on the flop:

Board: K♠3♠T♣
       Equity     Win     Tie
MP2    86.26%  86.26%   0.00% { 3d3c }
BU     13.74%  13.74%   0.00% { AdQd }

Get some money for that equity!
approx 1 out of 6 times you will lose, but if you are getting paid off have of the other 5 you will make money long term.

Edit: yeah, I know I picked a hand, not a range, but even if we weight it heavily toward flush and straight draws, your made set is still ahead

River is sick. I dont know what shove on R and check on T, AQ, JJ, maybe some missed FDs, but i dont know. Villian look active. We have good odds ....call is standard...... sometimes shows AK fastplay on R..... or some weird hand. Proflop is fold small pps. Flop is x/r with set.

Originally posted by Tyrion88
I would not call small pockets for set value preflop. Stats also don't show us a villain who is overly nitty (we could call due to implied odds) or who is super maniac.

As played I can totaly understand not to raise the flop to keep his range wide. But since you called for set value you need to trust on that he will call a raise with AK, AA, maybe KQ. And I think these are the hands you are targeting. I would have raised the flop.

If raised the flop, turn is an ease bet.

As played I think it is a fold on the river. But I would have never been able to do so at the table.

I agree, you cannot call the reraise profitably pre out of position, in position I think you could call with these stack sizes.
On this flop indeed you just have to raise. If villain has AA, AK, Axs, maybe even some other hands he decides to try to bluff you with, he will be more happy to put it in on the flop than on the turn or river (unless he hit a draw before you start betting, which is obviously not what you want). If he has a hand like QQ, JJ you will probably not get it in anyhow, so it makes no sense slowplaying your hand here. People don't like to fold a good hand at these stakes, so you will get called by a lot of hands you beat. People also love chasing draws, so probably any A♠::spade: will call of push for example. You really need to make them pay for chasing draws to maximize your winnings.
As played the river is a fold, but it's hard to fold it ingame. You really only have a bluffcatcher vs a river shove, I can't see which two pair hands he could play this way. If you bet this river, I think you have to make it like 1/2 pot to make him call with some bluffcatchers.

Thanks for the feedback everyone, I should have definitely x/raised the flop. My thinking was that the villain had been fairly aggressive and so I wanted to give him some rope to barrel off but raising is just a better play in the long run.