Originally posted by Incog
First of all, nice Blog u have here. Your commitment looks strong and I wish u the best. Keep up the good work.
Second ... I am just a fish in a pond, so keep that in mind :-PSome Questions:
Do we really keep the betsizes preflop the same, if we play with antes (3x standard ... 2,5x in LP)?
OTF: You are IP and I think ur cbet-rate should be almost 95% here, no?
OTR: I see myself only calling here. U are deep and your Raise looks strong, but with his shove it is an easy laydown, no?
Hey,
Thanks for the nice comments
About the sizings, I would say that no one really knows. I don't think it's what would make one a winning or a losing player, I think it's a detail, but here's my take on this:
I actually I do 2.5x EP-CO and 2.7x BT (well, 2.75 if I can, but that's not possible at NL10).
2.5x because:
A lot of regs have a 3bet or fold approach, opening to 3x vs. them is bad. Playing pots OOP is bad, so I'd like to keep the pot smaller. I've seen NL500 regs doing 2x EP-CO and 2.5x BT, so making 2.5x is already an adjustment from my part.
2.7x BT because:
I will always be IP, and I want to play bigger pots IP. Vs 2.5x and antes, people call a lot as well, maybe more than they should, and because of the rake I am actually happy to take the pot PF uncontested. I find that 2.5x vs EP-CO is more respected than a 2.5x vs BT (even when you take into consideration the raising range).
Fell free to dismiss all that I am saying, I have never seen a GTO chart for the microstakes in ante games, it's just what I think is the right thing to do.
OTF: Yeah well I could cbet but I didn't think villain would have hands like K5s (which I think is quite a loose defend and contradicts what I said earlier), so before seeing the SD, I assumed that his range would connect decently well on a 98x board, and as a consequence I thought I should cbet polarized here. OTR: Yes, I agree with all that you said, it's just that in-game I managed to do 2 mistakes OTR ♦
VS