Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL10 3-bet 2 pair flop OOP

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
197 Views
Dragar
Joined: 09.09.2008

Dont have a cow, heres your converted hand
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em $0.05/$0.1 - 6 players

SB: $12.01 (Hero)
BB: $13.24
UTG: $10.15
UTG+1: $15.48
CO: $10.63
Button: $12.11

Preflop: ($0.15) Hero is SB with K♦ J♣ (6 players)
3 folds, Button raises to $0.25, Hero raises to $1, BB folds, Button calls $0.75

Flop: ($2.10) K♥ J♦ T♦ (2 players)
Hero bets $1.39, Button calls $1.39

Turn: ($4.88) 7♣ (2 players)
Hero bets $3.35, Button raises to $9.72 and is all-in, Hero folds,

Don't see how we are ahead on the turn given that we are blocking some draws a bit and we have top two. I put him on AQ or a TT, but thinking it is AQ. I do not see other things shoving here because I have all the sets as well in my range as well, so if he has a two pair he should not shove here.

Also think I can bet lower flop and turn given we are blocking the flush draw a bit.

Thoughts on bet sizes and the fold?


Reply
Quote
4 replies
Coach
maniac
Joined: 29.03.2006

Well if you don't want to bet fold why don't you okay xc instead? For me there are its tough to fold here because you beat parts of his value range and he does that with a brick turn. Assuming he can fold 98 vs 3b. Most sets should 4bet you pre like AQ vs wide late ranges. That leaves weaker 2p mp and tp plus FD and one card draws plus pair. Besides the fact that flopping str8 is about 2 or 3% he is more likely to have a worse here IMO.


Reply
Quote
Incog
Joined: 18.08.2006

TT+ and AQs is probably a 4bet pre for villain. I would have called him, but I am just I NL2/NL5 fish.


Reply
Quote

Not folding top 2 in a 3bet pot


Reply
Quote
Fanko
Joined: 24.08.2010

Should be pretty close between call and fold. Probably doesn't really matter what you do. Maybe calling is better to discourage him from bluffing you on similar boards but it is doubtful if he even thinks about such things. Hand is decent and you still have 8% to improve to nuts so calling can't be wrong.


Reply
Quote