Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Drawing wrap versus agression.

6 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
708 Views
Hausierer
Joined: 10.05.2005

Wilhelm is unknown fellow.
For checking the hand is too nice imho. Building up a pott deeper might be good but Im lacking some flushdraw and also out of the backdoor. Maybe with a backdoorflush better? Didnt do the Math but now I think Turncall is not necessary.

GG Poker - $0.02 PL Hi FAST (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 118 BB
SB: 206 BB
BB: 102.5 BB
Hero (UTG): 223 BB
MP: 104 BB
CO: 100 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 9♠ T♣ J♠ Q♠

Hero raises to 3.5 BB, fold, fold, fold, SB calls 3 BB, fold

Flop: (8 BB, 2 players) 3♦ 8♥ T♦
SB checks, Hero bets 6 BB, SB raises to 26 BB, Hero calls 20 BB

Turn: (60 BB, 2 players) A♣
SB bets 60 BB, Hero calls 60 BB

River: (180 BB, 2 players) 6♠
SB bets 116.5 BB and is all-in, fold

SB wins 175.5 BB

Thanks for help :)


Reply
Quote
5 replies
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

With triple suit this hand is not printing money necessarily from EP but fine to open.

In flop hand easily feel better than it really is. If it was rainbow flop we cbet happily but here check is definitely fine. Reason is kind of simple. How many turns are you very happy to see? Two Q, two J, two 9 and three 7 so 9 turns in total. That is not huge amount especially if we get raised. I mean T is decent but we are still crushed by flopped T8 or sets.

For that reason to cbet this wrap we would love to have at least one diamond. Why does it matter? Well it makes x-r less likely and It give us one more nut out. BD fd would be another nice component. So on turn we call pot raise with 9 clean outs. Which mean 20% chance to hit on turn so we need 20/0.2= 100 so at least 40bb from villain on later streets.

On turn we have three extra outs so it's 26% so let's say 60/0.25=240 so at least 60bb implieds required. Now of course sometimes flush complete and we make straight and that will be enough. Or we could potentially turn our hand into bluff on 5♦: if villain check. Sometimes we get trips and end to hero call perhaps.

Anyway I think one good side in having fd available here is that we do get better implied value for straight as villain can easily talk himself into hero call because of it. Or he might overvalue set and shove straight completing river.

So as played call flop and turn is fine but I would personally question if we want to place our self into this possibility with flop cbet.


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Issue in what I wrote above though is that turn does give three K as nut outs but our Q and J are not to nuts anymore. Minor oversight :)

So yeah sometimes we might river 2nd nuts and be screwed.


Reply
Quote
Hausierer
Joined: 10.05.2005

Originally posted by ghaleon
Issue in what I wrote above though is that turn does give three K as nut outs but our Q and J are not to nuts anymore. Minor oversight :)

So yeah sometimes we might river 2nd nuts and be screwed.

If the K pops out I have nuts or do I misunderstand something?

Thanks for the very detailed and helpful answer. You pointed some things out which are great to know:f_drink:


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

On K you have nuts but on Q and J only second nuts.


Reply
Quote
naDanje
Joined: 01.04.2007

Open seems OK, but dont see much of a reason to cbet either. I'd rather go for delayed cbet on a blank turn if villain checks again. Top pair here is quite often not the best hand and our outs not all clean. I've been trying to think more about ranges, and our ep range does not connect very well here but sbs calling range actually should quite often. That alone kinda enough to consider skipping cbet I think and of course ghaleon gave plenty of reason for our specific situation. Even if turn is one of our clean outs this deep there is quite a lot of ugly cards on the river that put us on the spot again potentially.


Reply
Quote