Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

The problem with range bet sizing on flop

5 Posts
5 Users
1 Reactions
885 Views
Dr1fter808
Joined: 11.10.2017

The villain was a TAG.

GG Poker - $0.25 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 132.28 BB
SB: 156.44 BB
BB: 102.24 BB
Hero (UTG): 104.4 BB
MP: 191.84 BB
CO: 101.16 BB

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has T♦ T♣

Hero raises to 2.52 BB, fold, CO calls 2.52 BB, fold, fold, fold

Flop: (6.44 BB, 2 players) Q♣ T♥ 7♠
Hero bets 2.28 BB, CO calls 2.28 BB

Turn: (11 BB, 2 players) 7♣
Hero checks, CO bets 5.52 BB, Hero raises to 22.72 BB, CO calls 17.2 BB

River: (56.44 BB, 2 players) 8♥
Hero ? ?

Or would we rather just go for a pure value bet on flop?

Some SD gets there, some trips, smaller boat, and some bluff catchers.

River line?


Reply
Quote
4 replies
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

I doubt we are supposed to cbet that wide on flop? Which is reason I would go for bigger sizing.

I would just shove shove river after turn x-r which polarizes our range quite heavily. I suppose overpairs are bottom or our turn value range.


Reply
Quote

Shove the river but i think im just betting 3 streets on a Q high board as villain can be calling down lots of Qx.


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

I would just go for 3 streets of value with middle set on the flop and full house on the turn. If you check/raise like now it's tough to get value of to many hands I think. Draws will fold and Qx as well. 7x seems unlikely in villains range.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
monteCarlol
Joined: 24.08.2019