T9s on BB vs BTN, SRP, interesting river decision

I think block bet could be interesting option versus villain capable of big bluffs. Decent portion of our value range like flopped two pairs are not super strong anymore but can still go for value?

Originally posted by ghaleon
I think block bet could be interesting option versus villain capable of big bluffs. Decent portion of our value range like flopped two pairs are not super strong anymore but can still go for value?

Sure, that's an interesting take on his aggression, not only to induce bluffs but to induce raise by his value range, his value range(tight) should be something like 88/66/44/A8hh/AQhh/AJhh/QJhh/JJ/QQ/KK/AA.

I ran this thru solver and solver prefers 100% 3bet of T9s on BB vs BTN which is interesting because I don't remember getting correction doing sims on BB vs BTN.

Please do not click on the spoiler below:

Not sure about the check/raise on the flop with only 2 over cards and 4 straight outs. Lucky for you hit the backdoor straight.

On the river you could also check if you think villain could bluff the river, but if I would bet I would make it around 25bb for value.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Originally posted by SDK1987
Not sure about the check/raise on the flop with only 2 over cards and 4 straight outs. Lucky for you hit the backdoor straight.

On the river you could also check if you think villain could bluff the river, but if I would bet I would make it around 25bb for value.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Sure, I wonder which would look more suspicious, to CRAI or just jam on river. Because we want to represent bluff/the nuts, super polar.

I feel like c/r looks stronger, since you risk the xb nad we don't like that with our bluffs. Well played in this case. Think his call is rather marginal on the river, even thogh the flush did'nt get there. but for 140 bb his calloff seems a little over the top.

Originally posted by Infreed42
I feel like c/r looks stronger, since you risk the xb nad we don't like that with our bluffs. Well played in this case. Think his call is rather marginal on the river, even thogh the flush did'nt get there. but for 140 bb his calloff seems a little over the top.

Sure, solver would have you fold the river because of relative hand strength, SRP, and SPR. It just doesn't make sense to call there. It is a note worthy event though, imo.

Check rise would be nice, but I I would bet 3 barrel. We have nuts, he call 2x, so I like to continue with it.

Originally posted by Dr1fter808

Originally posted by SDK1987
Not sure about the check/raise on the flop with only 2 over cards and 4 straight outs. Lucky for you hit the backdoor straight.

On the river you could also check if you think villain could bluff the river, but if I would bet I would make it around 25bb for value.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Sure, I wonder which would look more suspicious, to CRAI or just jam on river. Because we want to represent bluff/the nuts, super polar.

Jamming looks really weird so deep I think. Normally I would go for a normal bet sizing or you expect villain could call light like now.