Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

6-max, 3-bet bluff, overbet shove river with weak ace

9 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
1,170 Views
Castle93
Joined: 06.06.2011

PokerStars Zoom, Hold'em No Limit - $0.10/$0.25 - 6 players
Replay this hand on Upswing Poker

PS_My$tery_ (UTG): $32.19 (129 bb)
Natrilis (MP): $27.86 (111 bb)
DuMaa66 (CO): $26.54 (106 bb)
BelSv (BU): $43.18 (173 bb)
rudboy32 (SB): $32.48 (130 bb)
misteralex93 (BB): $25.59 (102 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.35) Hero (misteralex93) is BB with A 8
3 players fold, BelSv (BU) raises to $0.60, 1 fold, misteralex93 (BB) 3-bets to $2.15, BelSv (BU) calls $1.55

Flop: ($4.40) 3 9 3 (2 players)
misteralex93 (BB) bets $2.10, BelSv (BU) calls $2.10

Turn: ($8.60) K (2 players)
misteralex93 (BB) bets $5.10, BelSv (BU) calls $5.10

River: ($18.80) A (2 players)
misteralex93 (BB) bets $16.24 (all-in), BelSv (BU) folds

Total pot: $18.80 (Rake: $0.85)
misteralex93 (BB) wins $17.95

After he calls the flop, I think the K is much better for my range than his flat / call flop range. When it Barry Greensteins, I decide to shove. I’m very torn about this. On one side, I think it looks more bluffy, but realistically, how many bluffs do I have in my range by the river that don't get there. I do think this line puts max pressure on an Ace who is splitting, but again, how many aces does he get to the river with?

My issue with checking, is I think all the hands which I beat check behind, and all his value hands bet. I don’t think he can have many bluffs here either with the run out rather than a pure float.


Reply
Quote
8 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Do you have any info on the villain in this hand?

Without this information it's tough to give good feedback, but read less I would most likely slow down the turn. It's tough to bluff on a board like this without much equity except the ace maybe.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
Castle93
Joined: 06.06.2011

I play Zoom on my phone so don’t use a hud. The turn seemed like a good card to barrel but actually, would be even TT or JJ on the turn and you’re right, I have no real equity. Maybe there was better spots to bluff when he calls the flop.

I usually prefer 3bet bluffing with A2-5s for added straight outs. I don’t think I can call in the BB though


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

What will you do if the turn card was 7d for example?


Reply
Quote
Castle93
Joined: 06.06.2011

I’d check / fold 7d. It’s better for his range than mine, and doesn’t really change the board so bad card to barrel.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Originally posted by Castle93
I’d check / fold 7d. It’s better for his range than mine, and doesn’t really change the board so bad card to barrel.

If you bet on flop and the turn card does not change anything why wouldn't you continue barrelling?


Reply
Quote
FriskyArt
Joined: 27.10.2009

When it Barry Greensteins

:f_biggrin:


Reply
Quote
EnriqueBunbury
Joined: 20.05.2010

Originally posted by Castle93
I play Zoom on my phone so don’t use a hud. The turn seemed like a good card to barrel but actually, would be even TT or JJ on the turn and you’re right, I have no real equity. Maybe there was better spots to bluff when he calls the flop.

I usually prefer 3bet bluffing with A2-5s for added straight outs. I don’t think I can call in the BB though

This,

Hello,

I think a passive defense is better with this hand.

Already postflop on the river I don't see a better hand folding and worse paying, so I would prefer to play x/f. TT-JJ and some 77-88 are going to play chbh, some float with KJs-KQs I think too. The only Ax villain has is A9 and A3 because AT-AQ folds them on the turn.
AK plays 4bet pf.

If it is not very agro you could play Cbet 1/4 waiting for a Hero call, which I doubt will pay much because in your perceived range is 99, AA-KK and AK


Reply
Quote
Castle93
Joined: 06.06.2011

Thanks man, great analysis. Completely agree with what you‘ve said!


Reply
Quote