Compare two JJ hands — both 4Bets pre-flop

Hand 1: call 25.9%, raise 15.8% to 19BB, AI 6.6%, fold 51.7%

Hand 2: call 37.6% raise 10.1% to 25BB, AI 1%, fold 51.3%

I just adjusted the 4bet size in BB because the 3bets are in irregular sizes.

So that's what GTO Wizard wants to do.

But of course, you can use your read and you can also randomize your plays, that's what makes poker fun.

Hand 1. You can mix between 4bing and calling however I will say if you are planning on 4b/folding then I would just pure call the 3b w JJ MP v Btn.
Hand 2. BB 3b size is a little bit small but not by much, I normally play pure call strategy in these positions with JJ and play the hand IP. I really think that by 4b jamming a marginal hand here you are only ever going to get looked up by better. Hope this helps.

Originally posted by Dr1fter808
Hand 1: call 25.9%, raise 15.8% to 19BB, AI 6.6%, fold 51.7%

Hand 2: call 37.6% raise 10.1% to 25BB, AI 1%, fold 51.3%

I just adjusted the 4bet size in BB because the 3bets are in irregular sizes.

So that's what GTO Wizard wants to do.

But of course, you can use your read and you can also randomize your plays, that's what makes poker fun.

When I checked my pre-GTO charts, these were both calls.

Using Equilab, and using "standard" 3Bet ranges — plus suited aces in both cases:
Hand #1:
       Equity     Win     Tie
MP3    54.44%  54.18%   0.26% { JJ }
CO     45.56%  45.30%   0.26% { QQ+, AKs, AJs-A2s, AsQs, AJo+ }

Hand #2:
       Equity     Win     Tie
MP2    55.77%  55.55%   0.22% { JJ }
BB     44.23%  44.01%   0.22% { KK+, A2s+, KQo }

So I'm a bit curious about the GTO fold recommendation.
Is it possible to find out what range the solver assigns to an opponent?

As much as I hate the idea, it looks like I'm going to need to start paying attention to solvers.

I would never be folding in both situations I would just flat the 3b in those positions.