Hello, it's been a while since I have posted but here is a hand that involved a polarized bet, something that I had been studying.
Live MTT, 100$ buy-in.
In the end I called with my J♥:J♦: since many draws would have missed, besides the
which doesn't seem very likely after the turn bet, so only 7♠:8♠: could have gotten there (obviously
or
).
I was actually inducing a bluff at the end, that's why I checked.
Also, I thought if I had put a half pot bet and then him jamming on top would have been a disaster for my stack, I would have had to fold, a situation where he is definitely not bluffing.
Seat 1: BTN (150000 in chips)
Seat 2: SB (50000 in chips)
Seat 3: BB (45000 in chips)
Seat 4: UTG (50000 in chips)
Seat 5: UTG+1 (50000 in chips)
Seat 6: Hero (57000 in chips)
Seat 7: HJ (50000 in chips)
Seat 8: CO (40000 in chips)
BB: posts the ante 1200
SB: posts small blind 600
BB: posts big blind 1200
HOLE CARDS
Dealt to Hero [Jh Jd]
UTG: folds
UTG+1: folds
Hero: raises 1300 to 2500
HJ: calls 2500
CO: calls 2500
BTN: calls 2500
SB: folds
BB: calls 1300
FLOP [4s 5s 5h]
BB: checks
Hero: bets 4000
HJ: folds
CO: folds
BTN: calls 4000
BB: folds
TURN [4s 5s 5h] [9c]
Hero: bets 10000
BTN: calls 10000
RIVER [4s 5s 5h 9c] [6d]
Hero: checks
BTN: bets 50000
Hero: calls 40500 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (9500) returned to BTN
SHOW DOWN
BTN: shows [As 5d]
Hero: shows [Jh Jd]
BTN collected 123300 from pot
SUMMARY
Total pot 123300 | Rake 0
Board [4s 5s 5h 9c 6d]
Should I had just checked the flop and release in the sign of any aggression from the rest of the 4 players?
Thanks a lot, kind of confusing hand for me.