Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL100 AQ vs Spewfish

6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
41 Views
SoyCD
Joined: 20.02.2008

Villan is same guy as in NL100 Straight on paired board against spewfish & NL100 74s SB vs BB

He calls two streets again which doesn't mean much since he does this both with air and strong hands. Its not until the river that he thinks he has to go nutso.

If I bet I'm already too committed for him to bluff raise me - so I just check with the intention to call.

$0.5/$1 No-Limit Hold'em (7 handed)

Known players:
[tg]SB$175.15:///////;BB(Hero)$100.00:///////;MP1$197.35:///////;MP2$51.89:///////;MP3$97.95:///////;CO$27.00:///////;BU$107.60:///////;[/tg]

Preflop: Hero is BB with A:c, Q:s.
MP2 posts deadblind, MP1 calls $1.00, MP2 checks, 3 folds, SB calls $0.50, Hero raises to $6.00, MP1 calls $5.00, 2 folds.

Flop: ($14) A:d, 4:c, 5:h (2 players)
Hero bets $9.00, MP1 calls $9.00.

Turn: ($32) T:d (2 players)
Hero bets $22.00, MP1 calls $22.00.

River: ($76) 3:s (2 players)
Hero checks, MP1 bets $160.35(All-In), Hero calls $63.00.

Final Pot: $299.35.


5 replies

that line is fine
although a lot of times I´d shove river myself expecting to get called down by worse Ax hands


TheBrood
Joined: 17.07.2008

Your line is good vs a maniac bluffer but he will have you beat many times. I dont know his stats but he could easily have 2x, 67, set, 2pair, etc

I think I read somewhere that vs these maniac guys you must play stronger hands than normal and/or try to be in position always. This way you can go for pot control if unsure.


Bierbaer
Joined: 27.05.2005

Vs this guy i'd bet bigger on flop and turn.
$13 on the flop, then the pot is $40 at the turn where you can bet $33, so at the river the pot is $106 and you have $48 left - perfect to stick it in and get called by surprising hands :P.

As played I'd still bet the river if he only bets either nut or air hands himself.
He will be checking back Ax or middle pocket pairs against which you'll lose value.
That is most of his range imo.
So check/calling is kind of a negative freeroll because you'll get it in vs all his better hands.


SoyCD
Joined: 20.02.2008

Originally posted by Bierbaer
Vs this guy i'd bet bigger on flop and turn.
$13 on the flop, then the pot is $40 at the turn where you can bet $33, so at the river the pot is $106 and you have $48 left - perfect to stick it in and get called by surprising hands :P.

As played I'd still bet the river if he only bets either nut or air hands himself.
He will be checking back Ax or middle pocket pairs against which you'll lose value.
That is most of his range imo.
So check/calling is kind of a negative freeroll because you'll get it in vs all his better hands.

Maybe I didn't quite describe how much of a maniac he is :)

He will pretty much ship any situation in which he thinks he could get something to fold ( In this spot he e.g. had QTo )

Considering this would you still prefer the bet? Not sure if he calls midpair against such strength.


Bierbaer
Joined: 27.05.2005

Ok, if he's that crazy at the river, and - most important - capable of turning medium hands into a bluff i definitely prefer a check/call at the river.

In this case the part of his range he's betting is much bigger than the part he could be calling.