[Closed] $16 54o freeplay flops bottom two

Villain is a reg I haven't seen in a few months, 13/8 213 hands

Don't thing so.

Also what a stupid line to potsize donk there with a set or toptwo, only thing thats make sens imo is a combodraw, but i like c/r shove more than to donk.
For me a easy shove in this case.

Originally posted by Annuit20

Villain is a reg I haven't seen in a few months, 13/8 213 hands

Don't thing so.

Also what a stupid line to potsize donk there with a set or toptwo, only thing thats make sens imo is a combodraw, but i like c/r shove more than to donk.
For me a easy shove in this case.

potting here makes complete sense... If I had top two or a set I would go for close to full pot on flop if I were villain.. I would lean more towards check/raising with 3 :heart:6 actually too maximize fold equity and get value out of something wrong.. although I would probably just prefer seeing a cheap turn card with that hand...

----

13/8 don't really look like solid stats for a reg =)... and we got blockers to all two pair and possible sets...
So I just get it in here and curse when he flips over 55

Originally posted by Annuit20

Villain is a reg I haven't seen in a few months, 13/8 213 hands

Don't thing so.

Also what a stupid line to potsize donk there with a set or toptwo, only thing thats make sens imo is a combodraw, but i like c/r shove more than to donk.
For me a easy shove in this case.

Yea but as I said I haven't seen him in a few months, and I only use stats from hands from the past 4 months or so

im just folding if SB is a reg. what are you beating?

KJ-KQ and draws, set with Kings is impossible and we block both other sets, just a easy shove.

Originally posted by Annuit20
KJ-KQ and draws, set with Kings is impossible and we block both other sets, just a easy shove.

He's not a good reg. It's not a pot sized, it's a huge overbet.

Originally posted by santostr

Originally posted by Annuit20
KJ-KQ and draws, set with Kings is impossible and we block both other sets, just a easy shove.

He's not a good reg. It's not a pot sized, it's a huge overbet.

Not a good reg= fishreg .... or not?
Yeah an over potsize is obv a set^^ ♠_ugly:

OP just said villain was a reg, he didnt specify whether he was good or not.

obviously hes not the best reg with a bet like this.

The bet actually makes it less likely he has KQ,KJ. He is definitely not folding to a shove. So what kind of reg is going to stack off here with KQ/KJ ?

The only hand I can see him having that we beat is 67h, or A3h.

And thats assuming he semi-bluffs his big draws rather than c/r.

so you are crushed by his most logical range (sets and better 2 pairs).

Yea he was definitely not bad, consistent winner at low-medium stakes. I didn't know what to think of his bet actually, perhaps a missclick (wanted to bet 150 and made it 350 by accident, idk). I've never seen anyone with a clue bet almost 2x pot here.

if he reads MP2 or CO as really passive spazzy fish then betting 2x pot with a set looks good. sets it up for a nice turn shove

Hi all,

I don't think 2x potting this flop is good with anything because there aren't quite enough draws on it to justify it. I don't think it's bad in every limped pot scenario.

I get it in vs a bad reg (protecting with KT+, semibluffing with combodraws) and snapfold vs a good reg (range consists of sets only and 54, probably weighted towards 54).

I ended up shoving (omg I has 2 pair ), others folded and reg called K5o.

Doublepotting there with K5o makes no sense. Oh well, fire up another! And note that he takes this line with the nuts on a board that isn't even that drawheavy.