Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL100 QQ in UTG2 - Study hand

10 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
84 Views
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
SB ($104)
BB ($116)
UTG ($100)
Hero ($158)
CO ($169)
BTN ($115)

Dealt to Hero Q♠ Q♦

UTG raises to $3.50, Hero raises to $12, fold, fold, fold, fold, UTG raises to $27, Hero raises to $158 (AI), UTG calls $73 (AI)

FLOP ($201) 7♦ T♣ 6♠

TURN ($201) 7♦ T♣ 6♠ 2♥

RIVER ($201) 7♦ T♣ 6♠ 2♥ T♦

so, after this hand I discussed it with my opponent (PS.com player who just happened to be on the same table). Stats are: 20/17/6 after 117 hands. Raise ep 25%; Fold v 3b 75%; Cb 67%.

He was surprised at my play, thinking I should rather have flat called here. I justified it by saying that he was quite loose and I felt myself comfortably ahead of his ep raising range. I also didn't want to play the pot multiway, which I feared would happen if I just called behind. However I'm not so sure and in any case I want to think more about this particular spot and try to calculate some expected values from different plays.

Let's assume the following:

1. Villain is a 20/17 reg. He raises also 17% from ep. He makes a continuation bet 66% of the time. His standard open is 3.5bb
2. If we 3b from utg2 he never bluff 4bs, but instead 4b/calls AKo+/QQ+ (a range against which we have 40%). Therefore villain folds to our 3b 85% of the time (2.5%/17%).
3. If we flat call and have a heads up pot, when we flop an overpair, we will have the intention of going broke.
4. If villain has over cards and no draws, he will cb once, (to $5 into pot of $8.5) then give up, assuming he doesn't improve. A 17% opening range is 224 hand combinations, 152 of which are over cards (i.e. 2/3).
5. If villain has a pp {99-JJ} which is also an over pair to the board (but no set), he will cb. If we call, he will cb again on the turn if he still has an overpair.
6. If villain has JJ, half the time he will bet/raise all in on the flop when he has an over pair and half the time he will play as in 5.
7. 13% of the time, when villain has AK, he will improve from flop to turn by hitting A or K and we will check/fold to his turn cb.

Calculations:

EV of 3b

0.85*$5 (1+0.5+3.5) = $4.25
0.15*(0.4*200+1.5 - 100) = 0.15*- $19.4 = $-2.91
EV =$1.34

EV of call
:f_cry:

It's too hard. There are too many variables :(

Observations:

When we go broke preflop, we give ourselves a chance of getting the money in against the AK part of his range. If we go broke post flop when there are no over cards, we are usually up against AA/KK, since he does not habitually invest his whole stack with TT/JJ etc (if he did he would be more likely to do so pre, in which case 3betting QQ would become a lot more profitable).

Instinct tells me that we should mostly be flatting here. We probably can't avoid playing more multiway pots as a result, however.
Overall, the key feature maybe whether we can get villain to make a mistake with TT,JJ more often than we make a mistake against AA,KK. If on a board with very low cards, villain went broke with TT/JJ all the time, we would be in a breakeven spot, but that is hardly likely.

Of course I'm overanalysing as usual. Does anyone have any general thoughts on this spot?

Thanks


9 replies
VzLOM
Joined: 23.12.2007

20/17/6 after 117 hands. Raise ep 25%; Fold v 3b 75%; Cb 67%.

emm, what is his 4b range? Are you sure he's goin broke w AKo here? I think ppl tending to fold it alot in utg vs mp w\o agro history (btw there was some?)
So i just want to see whether he can call 3b op. Most of good regs just dont do that in 100bb so we have to calculate our equity vs 4betting range already. If ev is bad and he's not calling 3bets vs us we have no choice but to call.
Btw there could be another good reasons to flat - i.e. agro squezers behind us.


Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

4b range 25% (1/4) - not enough hands really. He is 4b/calling AKo here because thats what he showed up with. But agreed, not all regs will.

Mainly Im interested in the general case (e.g. vs avg regular), but maybe there is no such thing :)


This reminds me my discussions with Skelm regarding polarization. I used to 3bet QQ here almost always when I thought I am ahead of his opening range and he explained me that it is a mistake. The problem is that by 3betting you only isolate against better hands. Exactly as VzLOM said - 3betting against UTG looks too strong.

I would not 3bet here even KK and AA. Calling QQ-AA here has imo these advantages:

1) he puts you on weaker hands than you have which will make him wrongly value bet. On low flop I usually just call flop and turn (or bet/call turn myself) and consider raising on river (usually shove already) or just calling his bet on river. This is really valuable line. They can suckout on you, but calling here and looking weak proved to be very profitable to me here.

2) flat call is perfect invitation to 3bet sq behind you in which case you invested only flat call and if UTG 4bets, you have probably fold. If UTG folds, you can 4bet/call yourself.

3) you don´t get into ugly spots if he 4bets preflop to your 3bet and rather keep the pot small.

4) you keep your position advantage!! You can use it up better in the slowly played spot rather than shoving preflop.

5) you can overplay your opponent

6) if you 3bet, he folds worse hands since your 3bet looks too strong. So rather call IP and not isolate against better hands

_cool:


Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Thank you, thank you, thank you!!
Excellent advice -- really appreciate it.


Happy to help, but you already realized it yourself before, I just put the "names" to ideas you felt yourself. I think it´s what this forum is about ;)


. I wanted to post hand here but have problem with hand converter


Bierbaer
Joined: 27.05.2005

Originally posted by Tim64
Calculations:

EV of 3b

0.85*$5 (1+0.5+3.5) = $4.25

0.15*(0.4*200+1.5 - 100) = 0.15*- $19.4 = $-2.91
EV =$1.34

EV of call

Of course I'm overanalysing as usual.
Imo you can't overanalyse, you can only outlevel yourself

Does anyone have any general thoughts on this spot?
I guess Jekyll covered it pretty much, but

from your calculation above and Jekylls post you can also draw some conclusions and take this one step further:
Since your perceived 3bettingrange from this position is very strong you have a lot of foldequity so you don't want to "waste" your strong hands by 3betting them.
What this means is you can start 3betbluffing in this position, everybody will give you a lot of credit - once they realize you call your strong hands and 3betbluff all the time you can stop bluffing and actually 3bet QQ+,AK MP vs UTG and get paid off.


Originally posted by Bierbaer
from your calculation above and Jekylls post you can also draw some conclusions and take this one step further:
Since your perceived 3bettingrange from this position is very strong you have a lot of foldequity so you don't want to "waste" your strong hands by 3betting them.
What this means is you can start 3betbluffing in this position, everybody will give you a lot of credit - once they realize you call your strong hands and 3betbluff all the time you can stop bluffing and actually 3bet QQ+,AK MP vs UTG and get paid off.

Wow, this is soo right and sick as well Imagine some good reg just move to your site from different site (e.g. moves to FT from PokerStars) and starts his new nick on FT. He is already experienced so he is aware of this and plays in a following way:

1) He always flat calls QQ+ and AK.
2) He 3betbluffs 4% of his range - I guess suited connectors are the best for this move. (with pocket pair you rather set mine IP as you don´t want them fold pre too much).

Then, as you are good player and got 3-betted by opponent who only 3bets 4% of his range (you view it as pretty much QQ+ and AK), you always fold AK and QQ vs him when you are OOP. So he collects lot of money from you and in case he flat calls you with his monsters, he collects a lot of money from you again

OMG, poker is such a sick game. You have to count with "experience of player" when interpreting his stats.

ON NL200 recently I caught one winning regular-player with 3% bet range squeezing total rubbish vs UTG opener and MP call (I was MP caller with KK) and I was so surprised about it. I only called my KK pre and played pretty cautious on low board all the way down to SD (just c/c flop, turn and river) as I was afraid of Aces. He Cbetted, checked behind turn and barreled river half the pot. In the end, he showed up with Q7s

This may be due to above reasons...

:spade:


Bierbaer
Joined: 27.05.2005

Originally posted by jekyll001
Then, as you are good player and got 3-betted by opponent who only 3bets 4% of his range (you view it as pretty much QQ+ and AK), you always fold AK and QQ vs him when you are OOP. So he collects lot of money from you and in case he flat calls you with his monsters, he collects a lot of money from you again

Yes, but as you see him showing up with QQ+ in a spot like this you can easily adjust by 4betbluffing his MP-vs-UTG3bets.

Originally posted by jekyll001
OMG, poker is such a sick game.

Hell yeah!