Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
SB ($104)
BB ($116)
UTG ($100)
Hero ($158)
CO ($169)
BTN ($115)
Dealt to Hero Q♠ Q♦
UTG raises to $3.50, Hero raises to $12, fold, fold, fold, fold, UTG raises to $27, Hero raises to $158 (AI), UTG calls $73 (AI)
FLOP ($201) 7♦ T♣ 6♠
TURN ($201) 7♦ T♣ 6♠ 2♥
RIVER ($201) 7♦ T♣ 6♠ 2♥ T♦
so, after this hand I discussed it with my opponent (PS.com player who just happened to be on the same table). Stats are: 20/17/6 after 117 hands. Raise ep 25%; Fold v 3b 75%; Cb 67%.
He was surprised at my play, thinking I should rather have flat called here. I justified it by saying that he was quite loose and I felt myself comfortably ahead of his ep raising range. I also didn't want to play the pot multiway, which I feared would happen if I just called behind. However I'm not so sure and in any case I want to think more about this particular spot and try to calculate some expected values from different plays.
Let's assume the following:
1. Villain is a 20/17 reg. He raises also 17% from ep. He makes a continuation bet 66% of the time. His standard open is 3.5bb
2. If we 3b from utg2 he never bluff 4bs, but instead 4b/calls AKo+/QQ+ (a range against which we have 40%). Therefore villain folds to our 3b 85% of the time (2.5%/17%).
3. If we flat call and have a heads up pot, when we flop an overpair, we will have the intention of going broke.
4. If villain has over cards and no draws, he will cb once, (to $5 into pot of $8.5) then give up, assuming he doesn't improve. A 17% opening range is 224 hand combinations, 152 of which are over cards (i.e. 2/3).
5. If villain has a pp {99-JJ} which is also an over pair to the board (but no set), he will cb. If we call, he will cb again on the turn if he still has an overpair.
6. If villain has JJ, half the time he will bet/raise all in on the flop when he has an over pair and half the time he will play as in 5.
7. 13% of the time, when villain has AK, he will improve from flop to turn by hitting A or K and we will check/fold to his turn cb.
Calculations:
EV of 3b
0.85*$5 (1+0.5+3.5) = $4.25
0.15*(0.4*200+1.5 - 100) = 0.15*- $19.4 = $-2.91
EV =$1.34
EV of call
It's too hard. There are too many variables
Observations:
When we go broke preflop, we give ourselves a chance of getting the money in against the AK part of his range. If we go broke post flop when there are no over cards, we are usually up against AA/KK, since he does not habitually invest his whole stack with TT/JJ etc (if he did he would be more likely to do so pre, in which case 3betting QQ would become a lot more profitable).
Instinct tells me that we should mostly be flatting here. We probably can't avoid playing more multiway pots as a result, however.
Overall, the key feature maybe whether we can get villain to make a mistake with TT,JJ more often than we make a mistake against AA,KK. If on a board with very low cards, villain went broke with TT/JJ all the time, we would be in a breakeven spot, but that is hardly likely.
Of course I'm overanalysing as usual. Does anyone have any general thoughts on this spot?
Thanks