Notifications

Clear all

[Closed] The $0-$10,000 challenge do you believe it ?

Donmecon · 2010-10-14T00:22:41Z

Chris Ferguson supposedly completed this almost impossible task of turning $0 into $10,000. How do we know this is true and where is the evidence. Anyone could claim to have acheived this feat but proof is what is needed. Pro poker players get us all to believe they are the best in their field and will never admit that poker is practically 100% luck. However disciplined you are and however well you make decisions it still boils down to luck. We can all get our money in with the best hand but how often does it hold up. I have spent a few years now playing poker, making a small profit in that time. Generally I make correct decisions but almost everytime I'm eliminated from a tournament or lose a big pot in a cash game it is because of plain bad luck. I suppose Chris Ferguson is Jesus so he dosen't have bad luck or downswings. The media are sadly to blame for this god like status that pro poker players live under. Programmes galore like Poker After Dark and High Stakes Poker are hyped up by the commentators who come out with " Amazing fold " and " Incredible bluff " as though these are the only people that can do these sort of moves. I expect all these amazing pros could turn $0 into $1,000,000,000 if they wanted to because they are the best, according to the media.

General Poker Discussion

Last Post by AussieIan 16 years ago

27 Posts

21 Users

0 Reactions

3,871 Views

RSS

Sasa1234

Joined: 22.05.2008

Posts: 298

14.10.2010, 19:53 0

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
boku could turn cat into dog while 50 tabling 180 mans SnG's at same time

♦

Schrader69

Joined: 08.03.2008

Posts: 345

15.10.2010, 01:03 0

I started from cashing in a freeroll for $2 on FTP and have grinded almost $10k never making a deposit + had no rakeback 4 most of it.

took 3-4 years but easily doable. i mean if a donk like me can do it, any retard could

esp since i am the most unluckiest person ever!

Zheelvern

Joined: 29.10.2007

Posts: 718

15.10.2010, 01:13 0

Ban OP!

X:club:X:diamond:

Donmecon

Joined: 21.05.2010

Posts: 40

15.10.2010, 16:45 0

I used the word "practically" can't you read

Donmecon

Joined: 21.05.2010

Posts: 40

15.10.2010, 16:47 0

Lets make a rule - before creating a new "Poker is 100% luck" thread one has to read through all existing "Poker is 100% luck" threads. Anybody with me? Moderators?

Can't you read I used the word "PRACTICALLY"

fuzzyfish

Joined: 12.01.2010

Posts: 862

15.10.2010, 17:20 0

Originally posted by Donmecon
Lets make a rule - before creating a new "Poker is 100% luck" thread one has to read through all existing "Poker is 100% luck" threads. Anybody with me? Moderators?

Can't you read I used the word "PRACTICALLY"

Sry, mate, what I meant to say was: "Lets make a rule - before creating a new "Poker is practically 100% luck" thread one has to read through all existing "Poker is practically 100% luck" threads."

But I had outs!

AussieIan

Joined: 10.12.2007

Posts: 366

16.10.2010, 12:26 0

Originally posted by fuzzyfish

Originally posted by Donmecon
Lets make a rule - before creating a new "Poker is 100% luck" thread one has to read through all existing "Poker is 100% luck" threads. Anybody with me? Moderators?

Can't you read I used the word "PRACTICALLY"

Sry, mate, what I meant to say was: "Lets make a rule - before creating a new "Poker is practically 100% luck" thread one has to read through all existing "Poker is practically 100% luck" threads."

ahhhhh, it all makes sense now, your just practically retarded.

Now GTFO and stay out......and have a nice day.