Please check my line on these

No master, but here's my thoughts.

Hand 1: My default would be to 3bet here against an unknown because you're ahead of his range. If he calls and discards one I would consider snowing. If he's really playing 20/4 it's an easy fold.

Hand 2: Easy raise. If he calls, fold if he bets post draw however many he discards, otherwise check behind if you don't improve. If he limp/raises, I would seriously consider folding as it's usually a pat monster trying to get action, but you do get very good odds to call.

At 0.1/0.2 first hand is auto-fold against unknown.

People are limping with nothing, calling with nothing but when they raise It's usually a monster unless someone is a total maniac or "Holdem player (cap KK/AA ♦ )".

Calling will be ok against QQ+ range, vs JJ+ it might be a marginal (very marginal!) 3bet because even if behind you have chance to outdraw opponent (unless you stand pat and give up so much equity like JB ♠_evil: )

Second normall raise...KK should be enough against most limpers that are sometimes traping or limping with weak 2 pair, but if he limps ~50% you can start with JJA+ on BU.

Originally posted by Huricano
Calling will be ok against QQ+ range,

I try not to call much at FL. If I'm ahead, I want more money in, if not, why would I put any money in at all given how static hand values are?

vs JJ+ it might be a marginal (very marginal!) 3bet because even if behind you have chance to outdraw opponent (unless you stand pat and give up so much equity like JB ♠_evil: )

I said 'consider'. Deception + position > equity (sometimes, and not to be overdone imo).

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by Huricano
Calling will be ok against QQ+ range,

I try not to call much at FL. If I'm ahead, I want more money in, if not, why would I put any money in at all given how static hand values are?

Funny thing because I was thinking in exactly the same way.
Why call? If I'm ahead - 3bet, if behind - fold.
I even open a thread on 2+2 with this question and some smart guy wrote:
"Pot odds say you can call as a slide underdog..."
Simple!

You're puting 0.2 to 0.35+0.2 pot = ~36% eq and that's why call>3bet.

First hand- considering stakes + fact that you hold one K (lessens the chance he's holding KK significantly) + small sample I would fold. IMO at 0.1/0.2 there are a lot of other spots where to make money.

Second hand - you have to raise limper and make him pay for all the crap.

Originally posted by Huricano

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by Huricano
Calling will be ok against QQ+ range,

I try not to call much at FL. If I'm ahead, I want more money in, if not, why would I put any money in at all given how static hand values are?

Funny thing because I was thinking in exactly the same way.
Why call? If I'm ahead - 3bet, if behind - fold.
I even open a thread on 2+2 with this question and some smart guy wrote:
"Pot odds say you can call as a slide underdog..."
Simple!

You're puting 0.2 to 0.35+0.2 pot = ~36% eq and that's why call>3bet.

Seems reasonable.

Originally posted by jenoc
First hand- considering stakes + fact that you hold one K (lessens the chance he's holding KK significantly) + small sample I would fold. IMO at 0.1/0.2 there are a lot of other spots where to make money.

Second hand - you have to raise limper and make him pay for all the crap.

This is a good point, but I suppose does suggest a call like Hurricano said.

And btw, I'm probably going to be playing some FL 5CD again to try to rebuild my battered BR.

They don't respect Yours cbet on NL50? ♦

EDIT:
Yea, good point about holding K.
I call this: "reversed kickerology" ♦

If you open raise you definetlly want to have QQAK3 rather than QQ432,
but if someone open raise and his range is JJ+ AA654 >>> AAKQJ

Originally posted by Huricano

Originally posted by jbpatzer

Originally posted by Huricano
Calling will be ok against QQ+ range,

I try not to call much at FL. If I'm ahead, I want more money in, if not, why would I put any money in at all given how static hand values are?

Funny thing because I was thinking in exactly the same way.
Why call? If I'm ahead - 3bet, if behind - fold.
I even open a thread on 2+2 with this question and some smart guy wrote:
"Pot odds say you can call as a slide underdog..."
Simple!

You're puting 0.2 to 0.35+0.2 pot = ~36% eq and that's why call>3bet.

So if you can call with AAxxx because you have 36% equity, you can't with 2233x because you only have 8% equity. Are their any two pair hands you can call with, or is it 3bet once you get to about Q's up?

3322x has ~7% equity only against higher two pair.
I was talking about his whole range.

If opp range is QQ+ and u hold 3322x u have ~7% or less eq vs 2pair+
which is ~7,5% of his range but around ~74% eq vs one pair which is
3*3,25%=9,75% of his range.

Average Equity (3322x vs QQ+):
(0.74*9,75+0.07*7,5)/(9,75+7,5) *100%= ~45%
Please notice that if x is Q/K/A you're even worse

AA vs QQ+ I'll do later...